[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D96946: [libcxx][RFC] Unspecified behavior randomization in libcxx

[Danila Kutenin via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

danlark added a comment.

@ldionne call of last hope, if I should continue the effort :)

Even with D113413 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113413> many users are likely to complain that new libcxx broke their tests. Yes, they should not depend on the ordering, however, there is no infrastructure to guarantee that behavior at scale. Providing an option to handle in separate builds and gradual rollout may help them to write better code overall.

It's not an ABI contract but I am pretty sure this will rise quite heavily when we decide to switch the implementation.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96946/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96946