[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D96523: [libc++] Rewrite the tuple constructors to be strictly Standards conforming

[Yuanfang Chen via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

ychen added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR31384.pass.cpp:52
+    std::tuple<Explicit> bar(std::move(d)); ((void)bar);
+#if TEST_STD_VER < 17
+    assert(count == 1);
----------------
EricWF wrote:
> What's going on here? Why are there different answers depending on the dialect?
Yeah, I'm curious too. GCC/libstdc++ seems to have the same behavior. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523