[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D96946: [libcxx][RFC] Unspecified behavior randomization in libcxx

[Danila Kutenin via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

danlark added a comment.

Ping @ldionne

Sorry for not pinging for so long

So, overall I am ok with putting this under _LIBCPP_DEBUG 2 but separate option would be better because the users do not want unstable results until they really do.

What do you think? Given the discussions in the C++ standard committee, I think this is a reasonable approach to give the users opportunities to upgrade to something better and show how it could be done. Having std::sort from 2005 and not updating/offering something better and standard compliant feels just wrong.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96946/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96946