[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D99044: [libc++] Split out `<__functional_{ops, search}>` from `<functional>`

Arthur O'Dwyer via Phabricator via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 22 08:12:06 PDT 2021


Quuxplusone added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/include/concepts:394
 concept invocable = requires(_Fn&& __fn, _Args&&... __args) {
-  _VSTD::invoke(_VSTD::forward<_Fn>(__fn), _VSTD::forward<_Args>(__args)...); // not required to be equality preserving
+  _VSTD::__invoke(static_cast<_Fn&&>(__fn), static_cast<_Args&&>(__args)...); // not required to be equality preserving
 };
----------------
zoecarver wrote:
> cjdb wrote:
> > I'm against this change, per my reason in D99041.
> You can keep using forward that comes from `utility/type_traits`.
Yeah, and I know libc++ style is generally to use `forward` over `static_cast`; I was just testing the waters here. 😛 (The advantage would be avoiding a couple of function template instantiations every time this concept is used. OTOH maybe that matters only if `__invoke` is also changed to avoid `forward`.)
I'm not sure if @cjdb's comment refers to worrying about "changes to `invoke` that aren't done through `__invoke`, and so we're blind to the changes", which by now I think Tim Song has put to rest; but anyway I think my path of least resistance here is to eliminate the diffs in `<concepts>` and try that part again separately, maybe after more of @cjdb's patches have landed.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99044/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99044



More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list