[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D90968: Fix for the Bug 41784
Ruslan Arutyunyan via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 25 14:47:22 PST 2021
rarutyun marked an inline comment as done.
rarutyun added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libcxx/include/atomic:1798
+
+ // delete explicitly in the most derived class to explicitly in the most derived class to satisfy
+ // the requirement that atomic (possibly volatile qualified) variables are not copyable
----------------
ldionne wrote:
> I don't feel like this comment adds something useful.
The mess in the comments was fixed. Or do you suggest something else? Should I remove the comment and just leave the reference to the bug or should I completely remove the comment?
================
Comment at: libcxx/include/atomic:1866
+
+ // delete explicitly in the most derived class to explicitly in the most derived class to satisfy
+ // the requirement that atomic (possibly volatile qualified) variables are not copyable
----------------
ldionne wrote:
> I don't feel like this comment adds something useful.
The mess in the comments was fixed. Or do you suggest something else? Should I remove the comment and just leave the reference to the bug or should I completely remove the comment?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90968/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90968
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list