[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D93003: [libunwind] LIBUNWIND_HERMETIC_STATIC_LIBRARY fixes
Ryan Prichard via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jan 16 00:38:47 PST 2021
rprichard added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libunwind/CMakeLists.txt:332
if (WIN32 AND LIBUNWIND_ENABLE_STATIC AND NOT LIBUNWIND_ENABLE_SHARED)
- add_definitions(-D_LIBUNWIND_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS)
+ add_definitions(-D_LIBUNWIND_HERMETIC_STATIC_LIBRARY)
endif()
----------------
compnerd wrote:
> Similar to the argument for the naming for the compiler-rt builtins, would you mind renaming this to `_LIBUNWIND_HIDE_SYMBOLS` please?
Should I also rename the CMake variable? And if so, do I need to continue recognizing the old name for backwards compatibility?
If we change the CMake variable name, at least ./clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia-stage2.cmake will need to be updated.
================
Comment at: libunwind/src/assembly.h:82
.globl SYMBOL_NAME(aliasname) SEPARATOR \
- WEAK_SYMBOL(aliasname) SEPARATOR \
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL(SYMBOL_NAME(aliasname)) SEPARATOR \
SYMBOL_NAME(aliasname) = SYMBOL_NAME(name)
----------------
compnerd wrote:
> Does this not change the behaviour on MachO? This symbol is now `private_extern` rather than a `weak_reference`. A weak reference will be set to 0 by the loader if it is not found, and a `private_extern` is a strong internal reference.
Is `.weak_reference` the right directive to use here, instead of `.weak_definition`? We're defining a symbol (`aliasname`) and setting its value to that of another symbol (`name`).
I think marking `unw_*` weak is intended to let some other strong definition override it. Its value won't ever be set to 0.
Currently on Mach-O, the hide-symbols flag hides almost everything (including `_Unwind_*`) but leaves all of the `unw_*` alias symbols as extern (and not private-extern) and not weak. With my change, they're still not weak, but they're private-extern.
libunwind's current assembly.h behavior for a weak alias:
.globl aliasname
.weak_reference aliasname
aliasname = name
The LLVM Mach-O assembler ignores the `.weak_reference` directive. If I change it to `.weak_definition`, it is still ignored. AFAICT, the LLVM assembler uses the WeakDef/WeakRef attributes from the `name` symbol.
e.g.
```
$ cat test.S
.text
.space 0x42
// Define foo.
.globl foo
foo:
ret
// Define a weak alias, bar.
.globl bar
.weak_reference bar
bar = foo
$ ~/clang11/bin/clang test.S -c && ~/clang11/bin/llvm-readobj --syms test.o
File: test.o
Format: Mach-O 64-bit x86-64
Arch: x86_64
AddressSize: 64bit
Symbols [
Symbol {
Name: bar (1)
Extern
Type: Section (0xE)
Section: __text (0x1)
RefType: UndefinedNonLazy (0x0)
Flags [ (0x0)
]
Value: 0x42
}
Symbol {
Name: foo (5)
Extern
Type: Section (0xE)
Section: __text (0x1)
RefType: UndefinedNonLazy (0x0)
Flags [ (0x0)
]
Value: 0x42
}
]
```
The Flags are empty.
OTOH, if I flip things around:
```
.text
.space 0x42
// Define a weak function, foo.
.globl foo
.weak_reference foo
foo:
ret
// Define an alias, bar.
.globl bar
bar = foo
```
Now both symbols are WeakRef:
```
File: test.o
Format: Mach-O 64-bit x86-64
Arch: x86_64
AddressSize: 64bit
Symbols [
Symbol {
Name: bar (1)
Extern
Type: Section (0xE)
Section: __text (0x1)
RefType: UndefinedNonLazy (0x0)
Flags [ (0x40)
WeakRef (0x40)
]
Value: 0x42
}
Symbol {
Name: foo (5)
Extern
Type: Section (0xE)
Section: __text (0x1)
RefType: UndefinedNonLazy (0x0)
Flags [ (0x40)
WeakRef (0x40)
]
Value: 0x42
}
]
```
I'm wondering if this LLVM behavior is actually correct, but I'm also unfamiliar with Mach-O. (i.e. We want to copy the symbol's address, but should we be copying the WeakRef/WeakDef flags?) It looks like the behavior is controlled in `MachObjectWriter::writeNlist`. `writeNlist` finds the aliased symbol and uses its flags:
```
// The Mach-O streamer uses the lowest 16-bits of the flags for the 'desc'
// value.
bool EncodeAsAltEntry =
IsAlias && cast<MCSymbolMachO>(OrigSymbol).isAltEntry();
W.write<uint16_t>(cast<MCSymbolMachO>(Symbol)->getEncodedFlags(EncodeAsAltEntry));
```
The PrivateExtern attribute, on the other hand, isn't part of these encoded flags:
```
if (Data.isPrivateExtern())
Type |= MachO::N_PEXT;
```
`Data` continues to refer to the alias symbol rather than the aliased symbol. However, apparently the author isn't completely sure about things?
```
// FIXME: Should this update Data as well?
```
In libunwind, there is one usage of assembly.h's WEAK_ALIAS. UnwindRegistersSave.S defines a hidden non-weak __unw_getcontext function, and also a weak alias unw_getcontext. My patch's goal is to make unw_getcontext hidden or not-hidden depending on a CMake config variable.
Currently, on Mach-O and on Windows, `WEAK_ALIAS` doesn't actually make the alias weak. I'm just making it a bit more explicit on Mach-O.
Alternatively:
- Instead of a weak alias, we could output a weak thunk -- a weak function with a branch to the internal hidden symbol. That's more of a functional change, though.
- Or, on Mach-O, both the `unw_*` and `__unw_*` functions could be WeakDef.
- Maybe the hide-symbols flag should only affect ELF?
================
Comment at: libunwind/src/assembly.h:104
+#define WEAK_ALIAS(name, aliasname) \
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL(SYMBOL_NAME(aliasname)) SEPARATOR \
+ WEAK_SYMBOL(SYMBOL_NAME(aliasname)) SEPARATOR \
----------------
compnerd wrote:
> I don't understand how this works. This is making the symbol a forward declaration, which is not a weak symbol definition.
Currently, there's only one use of WEAK_ALIAS, at the end of UnwindRegistersSave.S, which defines `unw_getcontext` to have the same value as `__unw_getcontext`, which was defined earlier in the file. It's generating one of:
.hidden unw_getcontext
.weak unw_getcontext
unw_getcontext = __unw_getcontext
or:
.weak unw_getcontext
unw_getcontext = __unw_getcontext
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93003/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93003
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list