[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D95821: [docs] Explain noexcept policy for narrow contracts.

[Louis Dionne via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

ldionne accepted this revision.
ldionne added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM with paragraph removed. This is small, but it's important to record these decisions/policies by writing somewhere so that we can apply them mechanically in the future and avoid wasting time. Thanks!



================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/NoexceptPolicy.rst:15
+
+Before version 13, libc++ did not specify whether a function that did not
+throw would be marked as ``noexcept``, so users should not rely on any
----------------
zoecarver wrote:
> Now that we just say that we might mark some functions as noexcept, we might not need this paragraph, what do you think?
Agreed.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D95821/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D95821