[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D116268: [libc++][ranges] Add indirectly_comparable concept
Nikolas Klauser via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 28 14:22:43 PST 2021
philnik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libcxx/test/std/iterators/iterator.requirements/indirectcallable/indirectinvocable/indirectly_comparable.compile.pass.cpp:21
+};
+
+static_assert( std::indirectly_comparable<int*, int*, std::less<int>>);
----------------
Quuxplusone wrote:
> Mordante wrote:
> > Is there a reason not to include `static_assert(!std::indirectly_comparable<int, int, std::less<int>>); // not dereferenceable`?
> > I would like to see the suggested comment copied.
> +1, also the one before it:
> ```
> static_assert(!std::indirectly_comparable<int, int, std::less<int>>); // not dereferenceable
> static_assert(!std::indirectly_comparable<int*, int*, int>); // not a predicate
> ```
> FYI I'm not married to those specific code comments. I put them because I thought otherwise it was a little subtle (particularly because these are the first couple of lines, where the reader is still getting a handle on what we're doing here). After the first two lines, the "not a..." explanations get really complicated to explain, //plus// the reader should have gained a little experience decoding the earlier lines, so I figured comments were more pain than gain at that point.
The reason is that they are not in the godbolt link and I copied the code from there :).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116268/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116268
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list