[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D108502: [libc++][doc] Cleanup, normalize, and update projects status docs

[Mark de Wever via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

Mordante added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx14.rst:1
-.. _cxx14-status:
-
-================================
-libc++ C++14 Status
-================================
-
-.. include:: ../Helpers/Styles.rst
-
-.. contents::
-   :local:
-
-
-Overview
-================================
-
-In April 2013, the C++ standard committee approved the draft for the next version of the C++ standard, initially known as "C++1y".
-
-The draft standard includes papers and issues that were voted on at the previous three meetings (Kona, Portland, and Bristol).
-
-In August 2014, this draft was approved by ISO as C++14.
-
-This page shows the status of libc++; the status of clang's support of the language features is `here <https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html#cxx14>`__.
-
-The groups that have contributed papers:
-
--  CWG - Core Language Working group
--  LWG - Library working group
--  SG1 - Study group #1 (Concurrency working group)
-
-
-.. _paper-status-cxx14:
-
-Paper Status
-====================================
-
-.. csv-table::
-   :file: Cxx14Papers.csv
-   :header-rows: 1
-   :widths: auto
-
-
-.. _issues-status-cxx14:
-
-Library Working Group Issues Status
-====================================
-
-.. csv-table::
-   :file: Cxx14Issues.csv
-   :header-rows: 1
-   :widths: auto
-
-Last Updated: 25-Mar-2014
+.. _cxx14-status:
+
----------------
mumbleskates wrote:
> Mordante wrote:
> > What has changed in this file?
> Line endings were CRLF, out of line with other files, for Cxx14-2b and Styles; I can revert all these if that's preferable. Notably this does not affect git blame.
I don't object against the change, but it was unclear what was changed and it wasn't mentioned in the patch description. I think it would make sense commit this separately, maybe split the patch after review.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/FormatIssues.csv:14
 `LWG-3340 <https://wg21.link/LWG3340>`_,"Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in [format.functions]",,,,
-`LWG-3371 <https://wg21.link/LWG3371>`_,"visit_format_arg and make_format_args are not hidden friends",Mark de Wever,`D103357 <https://llvm.org/D103357>`__,Review,
+`LWG-3371 <https://wg21.link/LWG3371>`_,"visit_format_arg and make_format_args are not hidden friends",Mark de Wever,`D103357 <https://llvm.org/D103357>`__,|Review|,
 `LWG-3372 <https://wg21.link/LWG3372>`_,"vformat_to should not try to deduce Out twice",,,,
----------------
Since these are on the same format page as the file below. I think here we should also add `|Not Started|` for consistency.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/FormatPaper.csv:12
+`[format.arg.store] <https://wg21.link/format.arg.store>`_,"Class template format-arg-store",,Mark de Wever,`D103357 <https://llvm.org/D103357>`__,|Review|,
+`[format.formatter.spec] <https://wg21.link/format.formatter.spec>`_,"Formatter specializations - character types",,Mark de Wever,"`D96664 <https://llvm.org/D96664>`__ `D103466 <https://llvm.org/D103466>`__",|Review|,
+[format.formatter.spec],"Formatter specializations - string types",,Mark de Wever,"`D96664 <https://llvm.org/D96664>`__ `D103425 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103425>`__",|Review|,
----------------
I like adding the wg21 links, but if we add them we should do it consistently in this document.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D108502/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D108502