[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D107877: Add issue tracking for spaceship operator<=> implementation

Kent Ross via Phabricator via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 11 00:19:23 PDT 2021


mumbleskates added a comment.

In D107877#2938647 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107877#2938647>, @Mordante wrote:

> Thanks for working on this. @rarutyun is also working in this area. I think D103478 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103478> should also be in this overview.
> The documentation build is failing, can you fix this?

Thanks! I was able to traverse from here and find a few more in-progress diffs and specifications. I don't feel the need for this to be an unassailably complete accounting of the total state of work at present, I think it's more important that it exist at all first.

It looks like the documentation build failed because there was a promoted warning that that one CSV had no data rows.



================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/SpaceshipIssues.csv:1
+"Number","Name","Status","First released version"
----------------
Mordante wrote:
> It would be great to have all related papers and issues in this table from the start. It should at the minimum contain P1614.
Okay I've added that one.

I don't know of many other papers that cover the state of the //library// standards at the moment, though I did find in putting this together that the <=> operator in [stacktrace.entry.cmp] is not described in the standard; I added P1614R2 and the brand new P2404R0 and a few related LWGs from the C++20 list; let me know if this looks wrong.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D107877/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D107877



More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list