[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D91911: [libc++] Add a 'is-lockfree-runtime-function' lit feature

[Louis Dionne via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

ldionne added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.pass.cpp:10
 // UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-has-no-threads, c++03
-// REQUIRES: non-lockfree-atomics
+// REQUIRES: is-lockfree-runtime-function
 
----------------
Ok, I think we're getting down to the bottom of my concern now. When is `!is-lockfree-runtime-function` true, but `non-lockfree-atomics` not true?

I want to understand in what context those can't be substituted for one another.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91911/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91911