[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D79406: [libcxx testing] Make three locking tests more reliable
Louis Dionne via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 7 09:05:14 PDT 2020
ldionne accepted this revision.
ldionne added a comment.
In D79406#2024856 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79406#2024856>, @davezarzycki wrote:
> Hi @ldionne – I've looked a few more tests that use lit's ALLOW_RETRIES feature. I don't think this is a straightforward scenario. While the flawed assumptions are often the same, the fixes are not. Do you want 46 Phab requests? Personally speaking, this seems like one of those cases where the cost of code review discourages bug fixes. If I create decent enough commit messages, would you be open to post-commit review for these test fixes? After all, the tests are already buggy, and we can always revert back to the known buggy version that we have today.
I'm entirely fine with that approach! Thanks a lot for taking a look.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D79406/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D79406
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list