[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D92659: [libc++] [LWG3374] Mark `to_address(const Ptr& p)` overload `constexpr`.

Fri Dec 4 08:33:50 PST 2020

ldionne accepted this revision.
ldionne added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Cxx2aStatusIssuesStatus.csv:281
 "`3373 <https://wg21.link/LWG3373>`__","``{to,from}_chars_result``\  and ``format_to_n_result``\  need the  ""we really mean what we say"" wording","Prague",""
-"`3374 <https://wg21.link/LWG3374>`__","P0653 + P1006 should have made the other ``std::to_address``\  overload ``constexpr``\ ","Prague",""
+"`3374 <https://wg21.link/LWG3374>`__","P0653 + P1006 should have made the other ``std::to_address``\  overload ``constexpr``\ ","Prague","|Complete|"
 "`3375 <https://wg21.link/LWG3375>`__","``decay``\  in ``viewable_range``\  should be ``remove_cvref``\ ","Prague",""
----------------
Is there a reason why we don't have a version of completion for LWG issues? It would be nice if we could say `Complete|12.0` like we do for papers. WDYT?

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D92659/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D92659