[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D62932: Update status

Zoe Carver via Phabricator via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 5 14:23:12 PDT 2019


zoecarver created this revision.
zoecarver added reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne, EricWF.
Herald added subscribers: libcxx-commits, dexonsmith.

- 2750 <https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2750> nothing to do because `std::experimental::optional` no longer exists.
- 2969 commited <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL333384>.
- 2696 <https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2696> because it has already been implemented and tests exist.


Repository:
  rCXX libc++

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62932

Files:
  www/cxx1z_status.html
  www/cxx2a_status.html


Index: www/cxx2a_status.html
===================================================================
--- www/cxx2a_status.html
+++ www/cxx2a_status.html
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2849">2849</a></td><td>Why does <tt>!is_regular_file(from)</tt> cause <tt>copy_file</tt> to report a "file already exists" error?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2851">2851</a></td><td><tt>std::filesystem</tt> enum classes are now underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2946">2946</a></td><td>LWG 2758's resolution missed further corrections</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2969">2969</a></td><td><tt>polymorphic_allocator::construct()</tt> shouldn't pass <tt>resource()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2969">2969</a></td><td><tt>polymorphic_allocator::construct()</tt> shouldn't pass <tt>resource()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2975">2975</a></td><td>Missing case for <tt>pair</tt> construction in scoped and polymorphic allocators</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2989">2989</a></td><td><tt>path</tt>'s stream insertion operator lets you insert everything under the sun</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Completed</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3000">3000</a></td><td><tt>monotonic_memory_resource::do_is_equal</tt> uses <tt>dynamic_cast</tt> unnecessarily</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
Index: www/cxx1z_status.html
===================================================================
--- www/cxx1z_status.html
+++ www/cxx1z_status.html
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2426">2426</a></td><td>Issue about compare_exchange</td><td>Oulu</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2436">2436</a></td><td>Comparators for associative containers should always be CopyConstructible</td><td>Oulu</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2441">2441</a></td><td>Exact-width atomic typedefs should be provided</td><td>Oulu</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2451">2451</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] optional should 'forward' T's implicit conversions</td><td>Oulu</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2451">2451</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] optional should 'forward' T's implicit conversions</td><td>Oulu</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2509">2509</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] any_cast doesn't work with rvalue reference targets and cannot move with a value target</td><td>Oulu</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2516">2516</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] Public "exposition only" members in observer_ptr</td><td>Oulu</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2542">2542</a></td><td>Missing const requirements for associative containers</td><td>Oulu</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2682">2682</a></td><td>filesystem::copy() won't create a symlink to a directory</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2686">2686</a></td><td>Why is std::hash specialized for error_code, but not error_condition?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2694">2694</a></td><td>Application of LWG 436 accidentally deleted definition of "facet"</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2696">2696</a></td><td>Interaction between make_shared and enable_shared_from_this is underspecified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2696">2696</a></td><td>Interaction between make_shared and enable_shared_from_this is underspecified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2699">2699</a></td><td>Missing restriction in [numeric.requirements]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2712">2712</a></td><td>copy_file(from, to, ...) has a number of unspecified error conditions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2722">2722</a></td><td>equivalent incorrectly specifies throws clause</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D62932.203246.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4532 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-commits/attachments/20190605/d57df1f9/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list