[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D59168: [runtimes] Move libunwind, libc++abi and libc++ to lib/clang/ and include/

[Joel E. Denny via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

jdenny added a comment.

In D59168#1470578 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168#1470578>, @phosek wrote:

> In D59168#1469186 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168#1469186>, @jdenny wrote:
>
> >
>
>
> I was also thinking about alternative names for the library path, specifically for headers we use `include/c++` but for libraries we'll now use `lib/clang/<target>` which is not very consistent.


Does that inconsistency cause a practical problem?

> I was considering `lib/c++/<target>` instead

A practical benefit might be the ability to use `-L` to expose clang's c++ libs without exposing other clang libs as well, but I'm not sure whether that's a real use case.

> but that wouldn't work for libomp

If we decide libomp shouldn't be version-locked, then I guess `lib/openmp/<target>` would work.

Is it safe to assume that `lib/c++` and `lib/openmp` would manage to be as clang-dedicated as `lib/clang`?  If other packages don't install to `include/c++`, then I suppose they don't install to `lib/c++`.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168