[Libclc-dev] [PATCH 7/7] Add several double constant definitions from CL 1.1
Aaron Watry
awatry at gmail.com
Tue Jul 15 15:54:46 PDT 2014
That's because I am evidently trying to write confusing commit messages.
The message was wrong, the code is fine. I'll fix that when I change the constants to hex format.
On Jul 15, 2014 5:38 PM, Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/15/2014 03:36 PM, Aaron Watry wrote:
> > Huh? These aren't under a version restriction. These defines were
> > available in CL 1.0, we just never declared them before (page 230 of
> > cl 1.0 spec)
> OK, your message says from CL 1.1 so it sounded like they were new
> additions in 1.1
>
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Matt Arsenault
> > <Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com> wrote:
> >> On 07/15/2014 03:24 PM, Aaron Watry wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry at gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> generic/include/clc/float/definitions.h | 11 +++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/generic/include/clc/float/definitions.h
> >>> b/generic/include/clc/float/definitions.h
> >>> index 18f2cbc..9ba8e99 100644
> >>> --- a/generic/include/clc/float/definitions.h
> >>> +++ b/generic/include/clc/float/definitions.h
> >>> @@ -42,8 +42,19 @@
> >>> #define DBL_MIN 0x1.0p-1022
> >>> #define DBL_EPSILON 0x1.0p-52
> >>> +#define M_E 2.718281828459045090796
> >>> #define M_LOG2E 0x1.71547652b82fep+0
> >>> +#define M_LOG10E 0.434294481903251816668
> >>> +#define M_LN2 0.693147180559945286227
> >>> +#define M_LN10 2.302585092994045901094
> >>> #define M_PI 0x1.921fb54442d18p+1
> >>> +#define M_PI_2 1.570796326794896557999
> >>> +#define M_PI_4 0.785398163397448278999
> >>> +#define M_1_PI 0.318309886183790691216
> >>> +#define M_2_PI 0.636619772367581382433
> >>> +#define M_2_SQRTPI 1.128379167095512558561
> >>> +#define M_SQRT2 1.414213562373095145475
> >>> +#define M_SQRT1_2 0.707106781186547572737
> >>> #endif
> >>>
> >> Should these go under an #if __OPENCL_VERSION__ >= CL_VERSION_1_1? Were
> >> these really not in 1.0?
> >>
>
More information about the Libclc-dev
mailing list