[libc-dev] [musl] Re: Powerpc Linux 'scv' system call ABI proposal take 2
Florian Weimer via libc-dev
libc-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 22 01:11:49 PDT 2020
* Nicholas Piggin:
> So I would be disinclined to use SIGSYS unless there are no other better
> signal types, and we don't want to use SIGILL for some good reason -- is
> there a good reason to add complexity for userspace by differentiating
> these two situations?
No, SIGILL seems fine to me. scv 0 and scv 1 could well be considered
different instructions eventually (with different mnemonics).
More information about the libc-dev