[libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Add definition of EOVERFLOW to generic-error-number-macros.h (PR #231891)

[Victor Campos via libc-commits]

vhscampos wrote:

@statham-arm Only after reading the code you linked to that I came to know that `EOVERFLOW` is not defined in the C standard. My PR may have been too broad and optimistic.

I have not made any related change other than this macro definition here. I have no indication that `EOVERFLOW` is suddenly ok to be expected in all builds.

So I am now more inclined to rever this change here and add a compensation code to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221349 as well.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/231891