[libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Implement lit-based test execution for Libc (PR #178746)

[Joel E. Denny via libc-commits]

jdenny-ornl wrote:

> @jdenny-ornl mentioned separately that `ninja check-all` was failing, and when I try that command I do get a lot of errors. @jhuber6 suggested a different check command and that's working, so this doesn't appear to be blocking people right now.

I can wait, but I am a little surprised no one else is complaining.  My understanding is that `check-all` is still the normal way to run all test suites, so it should not break like this.

> I'll test this more and ensure that scenarios that worked before work after.

Thanks for looking into it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178746