[libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Workaround for gcc complaining about implicit conversions with the ternary ?: operator. (PR #124820)

[via libc-commits]

================
@@ -81,12 +81,16 @@ template <typename T, size_t N> struct ExceptValues {
         StorageType out_bits = values[i].rnd_towardzero_result;
         switch (fputil::quick_get_round()) {
         case FE_UPWARD:
-          out_bits += sign ? values[i].rnd_downward_offset
-                           : values[i].rnd_upward_offset;
+          if (sign)
+            out_bits += values[i].rnd_downward_offset;
+          else
+            out_bits += values[i].rnd_upward_offset;
----------------
lntue wrote:

Thanks for finding the root cause of it!  I updated the comments.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124820