[libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Workaround for gcc complaining about implicit conversions with the ternary ?: operator. (PR #124820)

via libc-commits libc-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 28 13:04:15 PST 2025

Previous message: [libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Workaround for gcc complaining about implicit conversions with the ternary ?: operator. (PR #124820)
Next message: [libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Workaround for gcc complaining about implicit conversions with the ternary ?: operator. (PR #124820)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

https://github.com/lntue edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124820

Previous message: [libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Workaround for gcc complaining about implicit conversions with the ternary ?: operator. (PR #124820)
Next message: [libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Workaround for gcc complaining about implicit conversions with the ternary ?: operator. (PR #124820)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the libc-commits mailing list