[libc-commits] [libc] [libc] Workaround for gcc complaining about implicit conversions with the ternary ?: operator. (PR #124820)

[Nick Desaulniers via libc-commits]

nickdesaulniers wrote:

Can you walk me through here (or in the PR/commit description) what's going on here? Where were the implicit conversions; how does this patch fix them?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124820