[libc-commits] [libc] [llvm] [libc][math][c23] Add {, u}fromfp{, x}{, f, l, f128} functions (PR #86003)
via libc-commits
libc-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Mar 23 21:13:03 PDT 2024
- Previous message: [libc-commits] [libc] [llvm] [libc][math][c23] Add {, u}fromfp{, x}{, f, l, f128} functions (PR #86003)
- Next message: [libc-commits] [libc] [llvm] [libc][math][c23] Add {, u}fromfp{, x}{, f, l, f128} functions (PR #86003)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
================
@@ -839,6 +839,198 @@ add_fp_unittest(
libc.src.math.frexpf128
)
+add_fp_unittest(
+ fromfp_test
+ SUITE
+ libc-math-smoke-tests
+ SRCS
+ fromfp_test.cpp
+ HDRS
+ FromfpTest.h
+ DEPENDS
+ libc.src.math.fromfp
----------------
lntue wrote:
Yes, but _include-what-you-use_ is always better, instead of completely relying on transitive dependence. So if your test directly calls something in those targets, it's always better to directly include them in our DEPENDS list.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86003
- Previous message: [libc-commits] [libc] [llvm] [libc][math][c23] Add {, u}fromfp{, x}{, f, l, f128} functions (PR #86003)
- Next message: [libc-commits] [libc] [llvm] [libc][math][c23] Add {, u}fromfp{, x}{, f, l, f128} functions (PR #86003)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the libc-commits
mailing list