[libc-commits] [libc] 35b7843 - [libc][stdbit][c23] fixes typos in bit_width, bit_floor C type-generic macros (#84659)
via libc-commits
libc-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Mar 9 22:46:43 PST 2024
Author: Michael Flanders
Date: 2024-03-10T01:46:39-05:00
New Revision: 35b784379e707423f3b4f5a2cfedabcfa6f5b47d
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35b784379e707423f3b4f5a2cfedabcfa6f5b47d
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35b784379e707423f3b4f5a2cfedabcfa6f5b47d.diff
LOG: [libc][stdbit][c23] fixes typos in bit_width, bit_floor C type-generic macros (#84659)
Fixes #84658.
Assuming these were typos in the first place.
I am unsure of the best way to ensure that both sides of the
preprocessor condition in
`libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h` are tested. Could
someone point me in the right direction for adding test coverage to the
non `__cplusplus` branch? Or maybe it is being tested and I've missed
it.
Added:
Modified:
libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h b/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h
index 5b51068f866b71..e3eb6630afddb6 100644
--- a/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h
+++ b/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h
@@ -274,14 +274,14 @@ inline unsigned long long stdc_bit_floor(unsigned long long x) {
unsigned long long: stdc_has_single_bit_ull)(x)
#define stdc_bit_width(x) \
_Generic((x), \
- unsigned char: stdc_bit_width_ui, \
+ unsigned char: stdc_bit_width_uc, \
unsigned short: stdc_bit_width_us, \
unsigned: stdc_bit_width_ui, \
unsigned long: stdc_bit_width_ul, \
unsigned long long: stdc_bit_width_ull)(x)
#define stdc_bit_floor(x) \
_Generic((x), \
- unsigned char: stdc_bit_floor_ui, \
+ unsigned char: stdc_bit_floor_uc, \
unsigned short: stdc_bit_floor_us, \
unsigned: stdc_bit_floor_ui, \
unsigned long: stdc_bit_floor_ul, \
More information about the libc-commits
mailing list