[libc-commits] [PATCH] D150211: [libc] Rework of cpp::optional to support more types

[Michael Jones via Phabricator via libc-commits]

michaelrj added a comment.

I agree that `optional` supporting `UInt` is good, my question is whether replacing the existing implementation with a completely new one is the best strategy.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150211/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150211