[libc-commits] [PATCH] D150211: [libc] Rework of cpp::optional to support more types

[Michael Jones via Phabricator via libc-commits]

michaelrj added a comment.

Before I review this patch, I want to confirm that this is the right strategy. If the main goal is to support `Uint<>` in `optional` is there a way to do that without a complete replacement of `optional`?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150211/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150211