[libc-commits] [PATCH] D150211: [libc] Rework of cpp::optional to support more types

[Michael Jones via Phabricator via libc-commits]

michaelrj added a comment.

Ideally we would not like to replace the current `optional` implementation. Instead we would prefer to modify the current `optional` so that it supports the features that we need, and only replace it if modification isn't practical. Can you explain why you think that modifying the existing implementation of `optional` cannot work for your use case?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150211/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150211