[libc-commits] [PATCH] D130629: [libc] Change sinf range reduction to mod pi/16 to be shared with cosf.
Tue Ly via Phabricator via libc-commits
libc-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 27 10:59:50 PDT 2022
lntue added inline comments.
Comment at: libc/src/math/generic/range_reduction.h:82
- return static_cast<int64_t>(k_hi + k_lo);
+ return static_cast<int64_t>(k_hi) + static_cast<int64_t>(k_lo);
> lntue wrote:
> > orex wrote:
> > > lntue wrote:
> > > > orex wrote:
> > > > > From my point of view, this line can be changed to `static_cast<int64_t>(k_hi + k_low)`, because `k_hi` and `k_low` are already "integer", so you can do one static cast instead of two. Probably it can increase performance.
> > > > This is actually a must, since there are inputs which makes `k_hi < 2^54` and `k_hi + k_lo > 2^54`, causing rounding errors on the last integral bits due to rounding. If we work it out carefully and adjust a bit, we might be able to avoid these rounding errors. But for simplicity, I went with casting both to int64 in this patch.
> > > Sorry be intrusive, but below you convert the result to `int`. Does such behavior is covered by C/C++ standard? When you tries to push signed value to type which can't hold it...
> > I probably mixing up `int` and `int64_t` when moving things around. But it is well-defined as truncation for 2-complement representations, and guaranteed to be equal modulo `2^(bit size of int)`. So the end results are unchanged for us.
> Sorry again, but according to this https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/implicit_conversion it is well defined only in C++20, but as I remember well we are aiming to C++17.
Implementation-defined is not UB, so we are fine as long as `clang` and `gcc` have the same convention. But anyway, feel free to remove the implicit conversion to `int` below to make it strictly conform to C++17.
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the libc-commits