[libc-commits] [PATCH] D129920: [libc] Trivial implementation of std::optional
Siva Chandra via Phabricator via libc-commits
libc-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 19 23:28:59 PDT 2022
sivachandra added a comment.
In D129920#3664742 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129920#3664742>, @jeffbailey wrote:
> Updating with some review comments addressed, but not the asserts or the
> testsuite, etc.
I think, starting with a simple implementation like this is OK. IMO, we do not have to mimic `std::optional` - IIUC, we want something similar for our convenience but not exactly equal. So, this is LGTM after expanding the testsuite. Please wait for Guillaume though.
================
Comment at: libc/src/__support/CPP/Optional.h:21-24
+// This is very simple implementation of the std::optional class. There are a
+// number of guarantees in the standard that are not made here.
+//
+// This class will be extended as needed in future.
----------------
gchatelet wrote:
> I would list the requirements for `T` here, AFAICT:
> - default constructible
> - copy constructible
> - copy assignable
> - destructible
I think Guilllaume is just asking you to list them for now. IIUC, except for the default constructible requirement, they are already enforced?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129920/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129920
More information about the libc-commits
mailing list