[libc-commits] [PATCH] D82846: [libc] Add documentation for clang-tidy checks.

[Paula Toth via Phabricator via libc-commits]

PaulkaToast marked an inline comment as done.
PaulkaToast added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libc/docs/clang_tidy_checks.rst:31
+An advantage of writing a libc in C++ is the ability to use namespaces in our
+implementation. However, implemented entry points must be included within the
+correct namespace in order to export the C symbols properly. Without a formal
----------------
sivachandra wrote:
> I think the wording and examples should talk about the general case that all implementation pieces should be under the __llvm_libc namespace.
Gotcha, let me know if this is better.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D82846/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D82846