[flang-dev] Flang frontend driver conversation happening on slack

[Caroline Concatto via flang-dev]

Hey folks,

Thank you for the ones that took the time to go on slack.
The resolution for my two questions are:
1)the coding style in the patch should be similar to clang or flang and
  A: The new driver should follow flang style
2)the namespace should be flang or fortran.
A: The new driver should be implemented in the namespace Fortran.

The reasons behind these answers are in the slack channel #driver.
Thank you,

Carol

From: Caroline Concatto <Caroline.Concatto at arm.com>
Date: Thursday, 20 August 2020 at 11:25
To: "flang-dev at lists.llvm.org" <flang-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: [flang-dev] Flang frontend driver conversation happening on slack


Hey folks!



The development for flang driver has started on llvm-project/master.

We landed the first patch in:

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86089.

It prints help and version.



I started a conversation on  slack channel #driver (https://flang-compiler.slack.com/archives/C0134G7SRQV) about the patch.

The goal is to reach a consensus on how to proceed with some review comments and then update phabricator.

I believe that slack is more dynamic then email. I hope no one fill outside.



If you want to see how it is going and want to give me/us a hand please join the chat.

The two topics I’ve raised atm are:

1)the coding style in the patch should be similar to clang or flang and

2)the namespace should be flang or  fortran.



I will send a follow-up email summarising our decision.



Thank you Carol.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/attachments/20200823/d4a40264/attachment.html>