[flang-commits] [clang] [flang] [flang] Add checks for Fortran 2023 system clock and add f2023/f202Y to valid arguments of -std= (PR #205938)

[Tarun Prabhu via flang-commits]

================
@@ -1259,22 +1256,54 @@ static bool parseDialectArgs(CompilerInvocation &res, llvm::opt::ArgList &args,
         Fortran::common::LanguageFeature::OpenACC);
   }
 
-  // -std=f2018
-  // TODO: Set proper options when more fortran standards
-  // are supported.
+  // -std=f20**
   if (args.hasArg(clang::options::OPT_std_EQ)) {
     auto standard = args.getLastArgValue(clang::options::OPT_std_EQ);
-    // We only allow f2018 as the given standard
     if (standard == "f2018") {
-      res.setEnableConformanceChecks();
       res.getFrontendOpts().features.WarnOnAllNonstandard();
+      res.getLangOpts().setFortranStandard(
+          Fortran::common::LangOptions::Fortran2018);
+    } else if (standard == "f2023") {
+      res.getFrontendOpts().features.WarnOnAllNonstandard();
+      res.getLangOpts().setFortranStandard(
+          Fortran::common::LangOptions::Fortran2023);
+    } else if (standard == "f2028") {
+      res.getFrontendOpts().features.WarnOnAllNonstandard();
+      res.getLangOpts().setFortranStandard(
+          Fortran::common::LangOptions::Fortran2028);
     } else {
       const unsigned diagID =
           diags.getCustomDiagID(clang::DiagnosticsEngine::Error,
-                                "Only -std=f2018 is allowed currently.");
+                                "Only 'f2018', 'f2023', or 'f2028' are "
+                                "accepted to -std= currently.");
       diags.Report(diagID);
     }
   }
+
+  // SystemClockStrict warning check
+  {
----------------
tarunprabhu wrote:

Do we really need a dedicated scope here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205938