[flang-commits] [flang] [flang] Add notes from 10/21 Flang Community Call (PR #234268)

Alexis Perry-Holby via flang-commits flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 22 09:47:41 PDT 2026


================
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+<!--===- docs/MeetingNotes/2026/2026-10-21.md
+
+   Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+   See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+   SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+
+-->
+# Community Call 2026-10-21
+
+## Agenda
+
+* Design docs and/or RFCs
+  * [\[RFC\] Relaxing coding standard rule for {}-initialization](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-relaxing-coding-standard-rule-for-initialization/92443)
+    * Some initial discussion on Discourse, current status is a suggestion from one person that the rule should be relaxed for auto, but further relaxation is still desired by others
+    * Appeal to not overgeneralize and consider individual cases
+    * Currently there is a divergence from the LLVM Coding Standards, and there is a question about whether this is really what the community wants
+    * Agree to relax auto now, but need further discussion on further relaxation
+      * Will make PR for the docs
+  * [RFC: Compiler directives defined by plugins](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-compiler-directives-defined-by-plugins/92431)
+    * Related PR: [https\://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/228757](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/228757)
+    * No update at this time, continue discussion on PR
+  * [\[RFC\]\[flang\] Version array-section loops when the runtime extent matches the declared extent](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-flang-version-array-section-loops-when-the-runtime-extent-matches-the-declared-extent/91956)
+    * Related Issue: [https\://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/227442](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/227442)
+    * PR stack beginning here: [https\://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/231205](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/231205)
+    * Both PRs have received approvals, plan to merge later today
+  * [Add design doc for inline runtime checks](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/228502)
+    * PR has been merged
+  * [\[RFC\]\[flang\] Expanding array expressions and assignments at O0/-g](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-flang-expanding-array-expressions-and-assignments-at-o0-g/91971)
+    * Relates to the previous bullet point topic. Addressing slow performance in places.
+    * No update at this time
+  * [Cross-compilation of real(kind=16)](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/cross-compilation-of-real-kind-16/89161)
+    * PR has been posted: [https\://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221907](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221907)
+    * Please put comments on the PR, the author can not attend the calls due to timezone issues
+    * Discussion is ongoing on the PR, but responses are being received
+
+  *  [\[RFC\] Reduce \`ExternalFileUnit::Emit()\` call overhead for formatted sequential output](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-reduce-externalfileunit-emit-call-overhead-for-formatted-sequential-output/91674)
+
+    * Related PR has been posted, needs follow-up review: [https\://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/222522](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/222522)
+  * [\[flang\] Module files incorrectly expose implicitly recognized intrinsics ยท Issue \#219570](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/219570) / Intrinsic accessibility depends on compilation layout
----------------
AlexisPerry wrote:

Thank you for clearing that up.  To be honest, someone else added the part after the slash, and I wasn't entirely sure why but didn't want to risk offending them by deleting it since it looked odd to have things that way.  In retrospect, I should have looked closer at the issue and realized the title had been changed.  I'll make the update.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/234268


More information about the flang-commits mailing list