[flang-commits] [flang] [flang][cuda] Implicitly attribute allocatables/pointers under -gpu=unified (PR #209292)

[via flang-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-names.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-names.cpp b/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-names.cpp
index 279ce2546..c37685a7a 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-names.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-names.cpp
@@ -10619,8 +10619,7 @@ void DeclarationVisitor::SetImplicitCUDADataAttr(Symbol &symbol) {
   if (cudaEnabled && (cudaManaged || cudaUnified)) {
     const Scope &owner{symbol.owner()};
     const bool unifiedAllowed{!IsCUDADeviceContext(&owner) &&
-        (owner.IsDerivedType() ||
-            owner.kind() == Scope::Kind::MainProgram ||
+        (owner.IsDerivedType() || owner.kind() == Scope::Kind::MainProgram ||
             owner.kind() == Scope::Kind::Subprogram)};
     object->set_cudaDataAttr(cudaUnified && unifiedAllowed
             ? common::CUDADataAttr::Unified

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209292