[flang-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Don't try to privatize FORALL/DO CONCURRENT indices (PR #123341)

Kiran Chandramohan via flang-commits flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 20 04:04:12 PST 2025


kiranchandramohan wrote:

I was hoping that it would be the same change required for both FORALL and DOConcurrent.
I am slightly concerned that the handling for do-concurrent is different from the `do` indices. May be run the gfortran tests also once before submitting.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123341


More information about the flang-commits mailing list