[flang-commits] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [CLANG][OpenMP] Add support for OpenMP6.0 transparent clause (PR #166810)

[Abhinav Gaba via flang-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp45 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=45 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp50 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=50 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp51 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=51 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp60 -DOMP60 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=60 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp45 -fopenmp-simd -fopenmp-version=45 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp50 -fopenmp-simd -fopenmp-version=50 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp51 -fopenmp-simd -fopenmp-version=51 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=expected,omp60 -DOMP60 -fopenmp-simd -fopenmp-version=60 -std=c++11 -ferror-limit 200 -o - %s
+
+#ifdef OMP60
+struct ComplexStruct {
+  int data[10];
+  struct InnerStruct {
+    float value;
+  } inner;
+};
+
+typedef void **omp_impex_t;
----------------
abhinavgaba wrote:

What happens if we don't have a declaration of these types, e.g. if omp.h is not included.

Should we test for that scenario? A similar scenario for reference would be what happens with `uses_allocators(omp_default_mem_alloc)`, without including omp.h.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166810