[flang-commits] [flang] [flang][MLIR] Hoist `do concurrent` nest bounds/step outside the nest (PR #114020)
via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 29 02:48:42 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir
Author: Kareem Ergawy (ergawy)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
If you have the following multi-range `do concurrent` loop:
```fortran
do concurrent(i=1:n, j=1:bar(n*m, n/m))
a(i) = n
end do
```
Currently, flang generates the following IR:
```mlir
fir.do_loop %arg1 = %42 to %44 step %c1 unordered {
...
%53:3 = hlfir.associate %49 {adapt.valuebyref} : (i32) -> (!fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>, i1)
%54:3 = hlfir.associate %52 {adapt.valuebyref} : (i32) -> (!fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>, i1)
%55 = fir.call @<!-- -->_QFPbar(%53#<!-- -->1, %54#<!-- -->1) fastmath<contract> : (!fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>) -> i32
hlfir.end_associate %53#<!-- -->1, %53#<!-- -->2 : !fir.ref<i32>, i1
hlfir.end_associate %54#<!-- -->1, %54#<!-- -->2 : !fir.ref<i32>, i1
%56 = fir.convert %55 : (i32) -> index
...
fir.do_loop %arg2 = %46 to %56 step %c1_4 unordered {
...
}
}
```
However, if `bar` is impure, then we have a direct violation of the standard:
```
C1143 A reference to an impure procedure shall not appear within a DO CONCURRENT construct.
```
Moreover, the standard describes the execution of `do concurrent` construct in multiple stages:
```
11.1.7.4 Execution of a DO construct
...
11.1.7.4.2 DO CONCURRENT loop control
The concurrent-limit and concurrent-step expressions in the concurrent-control-list are evaluated. ...
11.1.7.4.3 The execution cycle
...
The block of a DO CONCURRENT construct is executed for every active combination of the index-name values.
Each execution of the block is an iteration. The executions may occur in any order.
```
>From the above 2 points, it seems to me that execution is divided in multiple consecutive stages: 11.1.7.4.2 is the stage where we evaluate all control expressions including the step and then 11.1.7.4.3 is the stage to execute the block of the concurrent loop itself using the combination of possible iteration values.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114020.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) flang/lib/Lower/Bridge.cpp (+26-11)
- (added) flang/test/Lower/do_concurrent.f90 (+59)
``````````diff
diff --git a/flang/lib/Lower/Bridge.cpp b/flang/lib/Lower/Bridge.cpp
index 877fe122265dd0..904dd82ed8149f 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Lower/Bridge.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Lower/Bridge.cpp
@@ -2131,18 +2131,33 @@ class FirConverter : public Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter {
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const Fortran::parser::CompilerDirective *> &dirs) {
assert(!incrementLoopNestInfo.empty() && "empty loop nest");
mlir::Location loc = toLocation();
+
for (IncrementLoopInfo &info : incrementLoopNestInfo) {
- info.loopVariable =
- genLoopVariableAddress(loc, *info.loopVariableSym, info.isUnordered);
- mlir::Value lowerValue = genControlValue(info.lowerExpr, info);
- mlir::Value upperValue = genControlValue(info.upperExpr, info);
- bool isConst = true;
- mlir::Value stepValue = genControlValue(
- info.stepExpr, info, info.isStructured() ? nullptr : &isConst);
- // Use a temp variable for unstructured loops with non-const step.
- if (!isConst) {
- info.stepVariable = builder->createTemporary(loc, stepValue.getType());
- builder->create<fir::StoreOp>(loc, stepValue, info.stepVariable);
+ mlir::Value lowerValue;
+ mlir::Value upperValue;
+ mlir::Value stepValue;
+
+ {
+ mlir::OpBuilder::InsertionGuard guard(*builder);
+
+ // Set the IP before the first loop in the nest so that all nest bounds
+ // and step values are created outside the nest.
+ if (incrementLoopNestInfo[0].doLoop)
+ builder->setInsertionPoint(incrementLoopNestInfo[0].doLoop);
+
+ info.loopVariable = genLoopVariableAddress(loc, *info.loopVariableSym,
+ info.isUnordered);
+ lowerValue = genControlValue(info.lowerExpr, info);
+ upperValue = genControlValue(info.upperExpr, info);
+ bool isConst = true;
+ stepValue = genControlValue(info.stepExpr, info,
+ info.isStructured() ? nullptr : &isConst);
+ // Use a temp variable for unstructured loops with non-const step.
+ if (!isConst) {
+ info.stepVariable =
+ builder->createTemporary(loc, stepValue.getType());
+ builder->create<fir::StoreOp>(loc, stepValue, info.stepVariable);
+ }
}
// Structured loop - generate fir.do_loop.
diff --git a/flang/test/Lower/do_concurrent.f90 b/flang/test/Lower/do_concurrent.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..cc6bbf69d21b71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/flang/test/Lower/do_concurrent.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-hlfir -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+! Simple tests for structured concurrent loops with loop-control.
+
+pure function bar(n, m)
+ implicit none
+ integer, intent(in) :: n, m
+ integer :: bar
+ bar = n + m
+end function
+
+subroutine sub1(n)
+ implicit none
+ integer :: n, m, i, j, k
+ integer, dimension(n) :: a
+!CHECK: %[[LB1:.*]] = arith.constant 1 : i32
+!CHECK: %[[LB1_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[LB1]] : (i32) -> index
+!CHECK: %[[UB1:.*]] = fir.load %{{.*}}#0 : !fir.ref<i32>
+!CHECK: %[[UB1_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[UB1]] : (i32) -> index
+
+!CHECK: %[[LB2:.*]] = arith.constant 1 : i32
+!CHECK: %[[LB2_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[LB2]] : (i32) -> index
+!CHECK: %[[UB2:.*]] = fir.call @_QPbar(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}) proc_attrs<pure> fastmath<contract> : (!fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>) -> i32
+!CHECK: %[[UB2_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[UB2]] : (i32) -> index
+
+!CHECK: %[[LB3:.*]] = arith.constant 5 : i32
+!CHECK: %[[LB3_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[LB3]] : (i32) -> index
+!CHECK: %[[UB3:.*]] = arith.constant 10 : i32
+!CHECK: %[[UB3_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[UB3]] : (i32) -> index
+
+!CHECK: fir.do_loop %{{.*}} = %[[LB1_CVT]] to %[[UB1_CVT]] step %{{.*}} unordered
+!CHECK: fir.do_loop %{{.*}} = %[[LB2_CVT]] to %[[UB2_CVT]] step %{{.*}} unordered
+!CHECK: fir.do_loop %{{.*}} = %[[LB3_CVT]] to %[[UB3_CVT]] step %{{.*}} unordered
+
+ do concurrent(i=1:n, j=1:bar(n*m, n/m), k=5:10)
+ a(i) = n
+ end do
+end subroutine
+
+subroutine sub2(n)
+ implicit none
+ integer :: n, m, i, j
+ integer, dimension(n) :: a
+!CHECK: %[[LB1:.*]] = arith.constant 1 : i32
+!CHECK: %[[LB1_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[LB1]] : (i32) -> index
+!CHECK: %[[UB1:.*]] = fir.load %5#0 : !fir.ref<i32>
+!CHECK: %[[UB1_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[UB1]] : (i32) -> index
+!CHECK: fir.do_loop %{{.*}} = %[[LB1_CVT]] to %[[UB1_CVT]] step %{{.*}} unordered
+!CHECK: %[[LB2:.*]] = arith.constant 1 : i32
+!CHECK: %[[LB2_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[LB2]] : (i32) -> index
+!CHECK: %[[UB2:.*]] = fir.call @_QPbar(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}) proc_attrs<pure> fastmath<contract> : (!fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>) -> i32
+!CHECK: %[[UB2_CVT:.*]] = fir.convert %[[UB2]] : (i32) -> index
+!CHECK: fir.do_loop %{{.*}} = %[[LB2_CVT]] to %[[UB2_CVT]] step %{{.*}} unordered
+ do concurrent(i=1:n)
+ do concurrent(j=1:bar(n*m, n/m))
+ a(i) = n
+ end do
+ end do
+end subroutine
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114020
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list