[flang-commits] [flang] [mlir] [flang][OpenMP] WIP: Rewrite `omp.loop` to semantically equivalent ops (PR #115443)
Tom Eccles via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 11 07:29:44 PST 2024
================
@@ -50,4 +50,16 @@ def FunctionFilteringPass : Pass<"omp-function-filtering"> {
];
}
+def GenericLoopConversionPass
+ : Pass<"omp-generic-loop-conversion", "mlir::func::FuncOp"> {
----------------
tblah wrote:
Is there any chance we could have loop wrapper ops nested inside of other operations some day?
I'm not saying this is a real case - just an example: say we used a parallel do inside of an omp.private copy region to copy each element of an array in parallel.
I imagine this is a no, I just wanted to check.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115443
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list