[flang-commits] [llvm] [clang] [libcxx] [libc] [compiler-rt] [lld] [libcxxabi] [flang] [clang-tools-extra] [CSSPGO] Compute and report post-match profile staleness (PR #79090)
Lei Wang via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 29 13:47:27 PST 2024
================
@@ -2460,63 +2528,108 @@ void SampleProfileMatcher::runOnFunction(const Function &F) {
!ProbeManager->profileIsValid(F, *FSFlattened)) {
// The matching result will be saved to IRToProfileLocationMap, create a new
// map for each function.
+ auto &IRToProfileLocationMap = getIRToProfileLocationMap(F);
runStaleProfileMatching(F, IRAnchors, ProfileAnchors,
- getIRToProfileLocationMap(F));
+ IRToProfileLocationMap);
+ PostMatchStats.countMismatchedCallsites(F, IRAnchors, ProfileAnchors,
+ IRToProfileLocationMap);
}
}
-void SampleProfileMatcher::runOnModule() {
- ProfileConverter::flattenProfile(Reader.getProfiles(), FlattenedProfiles,
- FunctionSamples::ProfileIsCS);
- for (auto &F : M) {
- if (F.isDeclaration() || !F.hasFnAttribute("use-sample-profile"))
- continue;
- runOnFunction(F);
- }
- if (SalvageStaleProfile)
- distributeIRToProfileLocationMap();
-
+void SampleProfileMatcher::reportOrPersistProfileStats() {
if (ReportProfileStaleness) {
if (FunctionSamples::ProfileIsProbeBased) {
- errs() << "(" << NumMismatchedFuncHash << "/" << TotalProfiledFunc << ")"
+ errs() << "(" << PreMatchStats.NumMismatchedFuncHash << "/"
+ << PreMatchStats.TotalProfiledFunc << ")"
<< " of functions' profile are invalid and "
- << " (" << MismatchedFuncHashSamples << "/" << TotalFuncHashSamples
- << ")"
+ << " (" << PreMatchStats.MismatchedFuncHashSamples << "/"
+ << PreMatchStats.TotalFunctionSamples << ")"
<< " of samples are discarded due to function hash mismatch.\n";
}
- errs() << "(" << NumMismatchedCallsites << "/" << TotalProfiledCallsites
- << ")"
+ errs() << "(" << PreMatchStats.NumMismatchedCallsites << "/"
+ << PreMatchStats.TotalProfiledCallsites << ")"
<< " of callsites' profile are invalid and "
- << "(" << MismatchedCallsiteSamples << "/" << TotalCallsiteSamples
- << ")"
+ << "(" << PreMatchStats.MismatchedCallsiteSamples << "/"
+ << PreMatchStats.TotalFunctionSamples << ")"
<< " of samples are discarded due to callsite location mismatch.\n";
+ if (SalvageStaleProfile) {
+ uint64_t NumRecoveredCallsites = PostMatchStats.TotalProfiledCallsites -
+ PostMatchStats.NumMismatchedCallsites;
+ uint64_t NumMismatchedCallsites =
+ PreMatchStats.NumMismatchedCallsites - NumRecoveredCallsites;
+ errs() << "Out of " << PostMatchStats.TotalProfiledCallsites
+ << " callsites used for profile matching, "
+ << NumRecoveredCallsites
+ << " callsites have been recovered. After the matching, ("
+ << NumMismatchedCallsites << "/"
+ << PreMatchStats.TotalProfiledCallsites
+ << ") of callsites are still invalid ("
+ << PostMatchStats.MismatchedCallsiteSamples << "/"
+ << PreMatchStats.TotalFunctionSamples << ")"
+ << " of samples are still discarded.\n";
+ }
}
if (PersistProfileStaleness) {
LLVMContext &Ctx = M.getContext();
MDBuilder MDB(Ctx);
SmallVector<std::pair<StringRef, uint64_t>> ProfStatsVec;
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("NumMismatchedCallsites",
+ PreMatchStats.NumMismatchedCallsites);
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("TotalProfiledCallsites",
+ PreMatchStats.TotalProfiledCallsites);
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("MismatchedCallsiteSamples",
+ PreMatchStats.MismatchedCallsiteSamples);
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("TotalProfiledFunc",
+ PreMatchStats.TotalProfiledFunc);
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("TotalFunctionSamples",
+ PreMatchStats.TotalFunctionSamples);
if (FunctionSamples::ProfileIsProbeBased) {
- ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("NumMismatchedFuncHash", NumMismatchedFuncHash);
- ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("TotalProfiledFunc", TotalProfiledFunc);
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("NumMismatchedFuncHash",
+ PreMatchStats.NumMismatchedFuncHash);
ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("MismatchedFuncHashSamples",
- MismatchedFuncHashSamples);
- ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("TotalFuncHashSamples", TotalFuncHashSamples);
+ PreMatchStats.MismatchedFuncHashSamples);
+ }
+ if (SalvageStaleProfile) {
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("PostMatchNumMismatchedCallsites",
+ PostMatchStats.NumMismatchedCallsites);
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("NumCallsitesForMatching",
+ PostMatchStats.TotalProfiledCallsites);
+ ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("PostMatchMismatchedCallsiteSamples",
+ PostMatchStats.MismatchedCallsiteSamples);
}
-
- ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("NumMismatchedCallsites", NumMismatchedCallsites);
- ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("TotalProfiledCallsites", TotalProfiledCallsites);
- ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("MismatchedCallsiteSamples",
- MismatchedCallsiteSamples);
- ProfStatsVec.emplace_back("TotalCallsiteSamples", TotalCallsiteSamples);
auto *MD = MDB.createLLVMStats(ProfStatsVec);
auto *NMD = M.getOrInsertNamedMetadata("llvm.stats");
NMD->addOperand(MD);
}
}
+void SampleProfileMatcher::runOnModule() {
+ ProfileConverter::flattenProfile(Reader.getProfiles(), FlattenedProfiles,
+ FunctionSamples::ProfileIsCS);
+ for (auto &F : M) {
+ if (ShouldSkipProfileLoading(F))
+ continue;
+ runOnFunction(F);
+ }
+
+ if (SalvageStaleProfile)
+ distributeIRToProfileLocationMap();
+
+ PreMatchStats.countMismatchedCallsiteSamples();
+ if (SalvageStaleProfile) {
+ // If a function doesn't run the matching but has mismatched callsites, this
+ // won't be any data for that function in post-match stats, so just reuse
+ // the pre-match stats.
+ PostMatchStats.copyUnchangedCallsiteMismatches(
+ PreMatchStats.FuncMismatchedCallsites);
+ PostMatchStats.countMismatchedCallsiteSamples();
----------------
wlei-llvm wrote:
> Could you explain this? what is a new mismatch? My understanding is there is a set of mismatches from input, after fuzzy matching, we recovered some of the originally mismatched, though we don't know if the recovery is correct or not.
Yeah, It depends on which heuristic we use. Some anchors are aligned based on the previous matched anchors, there could be the original function is by luck matched but we run matching to "fix" it to a mismatched location. for example:
Before matching, supposing 5:E is matched by luck.
```
IR : 1:A, 2: B, 3:C, 4: D, 5:E
| | |
Profile : 3:A, 4: B, 5:E, 6:D, 7:E
```
After matching:
```
IR : 1:A, 2: B, 3:C, 4: D, 5:E
| | | | |
Profile : 3:A, 4: B, 5:E, 6:D, 8:E
```
However, after matching, the 5:E is synced to 3:c based on the offset (1:A --> 3:A), this is the new mismatch. So, that's why I was thinking to recompute/reuse the "counting" function from scratch, without relying on the matching heuristic.
>
> > We need to save TotalProfiledCallsite, as we don't have the ProfAnchors for the counting at the end.
>
> Incrementing counter along with tracking `FuncMismatchedCallsites` seems fine?
OK, that seems not obey the rule to move "all" the stats out of function-level. No strong option on this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79090
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list