[flang-commits] [flang] [clang] [llvm] [compiler-rt] [clang-tools-extra] [VPlan] Replace VPRecipeOrVPValue with VP2VP recipe simplification. (PR #76090)
Florian Hahn via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jan 28 04:44:24 PST 2024
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76090
>From 7c31c8bc2acf60bd50cb6d63944ee8d4946b9638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn <flo at fhahn.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 21:33:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [VPlan] Replace VPRecieOrVPValue with VP2VP recipe
simplification.
Move simplification of VPBlendRecipes from early VPlan construction to
VPlan-to-VPlan based recipe simplification. This simplifies initial
construction.
Note that some in-loop reduction tests are failing at the moment, due to
the reduction predicate being created after the reduction recipe. I will
provide a patch for that soon.
---
.../Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | 99 +++++++------------
.../Transforms/Vectorize/VPRecipeBuilder.h | 23 ++---
.../Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp | 34 ++++++-
.../Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
index f82e161fb846d18..609a927d23754b3 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
@@ -8256,31 +8256,10 @@ VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe *VPRecipeBuilder::tryToOptimizeInductionTruncate(
return nullptr;
}
-VPRecipeOrVPValueTy VPRecipeBuilder::tryToBlend(PHINode *Phi,
- ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
- VPlanPtr &Plan) {
- // If all incoming values are equal, the incoming VPValue can be used directly
- // instead of creating a new VPBlendRecipe.
- if (llvm::all_equal(Operands))
- return Operands[0];
-
+VPBlendRecipe *VPRecipeBuilder::tryToBlend(PHINode *Phi,
+ ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
+ VPlanPtr &Plan) {
unsigned NumIncoming = Phi->getNumIncomingValues();
- // For in-loop reductions, we do not need to create an additional select.
- VPValue *InLoopVal = nullptr;
- for (unsigned In = 0; In < NumIncoming; In++) {
- PHINode *PhiOp =
- dyn_cast_or_null<PHINode>(Operands[In]->getUnderlyingValue());
- if (PhiOp && CM.isInLoopReduction(PhiOp)) {
- assert(!InLoopVal && "Found more than one in-loop reduction!");
- InLoopVal = Operands[In];
- }
- }
-
- assert((!InLoopVal || NumIncoming == 2) &&
- "Found an in-loop reduction for PHI with unexpected number of "
- "incoming values");
- if (InLoopVal)
- return Operands[Operands[0] == InLoopVal ? 1 : 0];
// We know that all PHIs in non-header blocks are converted into selects, so
// we don't have to worry about the insertion order and we can just use the
@@ -8292,13 +8271,13 @@ VPRecipeOrVPValueTy VPRecipeBuilder::tryToBlend(PHINode *Phi,
for (unsigned In = 0; In < NumIncoming; In++) {
VPValue *EdgeMask =
createEdgeMask(Phi->getIncomingBlock(In), Phi->getParent(), *Plan);
- assert((EdgeMask || NumIncoming == 1) &&
+ assert((EdgeMask || NumIncoming == 1 || Operands[In] == Operands[0]) &&
"Multiple predecessors with one having a full mask");
OperandsWithMask.push_back(Operands[In]);
if (EdgeMask)
OperandsWithMask.push_back(EdgeMask);
}
- return toVPRecipeResult(new VPBlendRecipe(Phi, OperandsWithMask));
+ return new VPBlendRecipe(Phi, OperandsWithMask);
}
VPWidenCallRecipe *VPRecipeBuilder::tryToWidenCall(CallInst *CI,
@@ -8464,9 +8443,8 @@ void VPRecipeBuilder::fixHeaderPhis() {
}
}
-VPRecipeOrVPValueTy VPRecipeBuilder::handleReplication(Instruction *I,
- VFRange &Range,
- VPlan &Plan) {
+VPRecipeBase *VPRecipeBuilder::handleReplication(Instruction *I, VFRange &Range,
+ VPlan &Plan) {
bool IsUniform = LoopVectorizationPlanner::getDecisionAndClampRange(
[&](ElementCount VF) { return CM.isUniformAfterVectorization(I, VF); },
Range);
@@ -8518,14 +8496,12 @@ VPRecipeOrVPValueTy VPRecipeBuilder::handleReplication(Instruction *I,
auto *Recipe = new VPReplicateRecipe(I, Plan.mapToVPValues(I->operands()),
IsUniform, BlockInMask);
- return toVPRecipeResult(Recipe);
+ return Recipe;
}
-VPRecipeOrVPValueTy
-VPRecipeBuilder::tryToCreateWidenRecipe(Instruction *Instr,
- ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
- VFRange &Range, VPBasicBlock *VPBB,
- VPlanPtr &Plan) {
+VPRecipeBase *VPRecipeBuilder::tryToCreateWidenRecipe(
+ Instruction *Instr, ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands, VFRange &Range,
+ VPBasicBlock *VPBB, VPlanPtr &Plan) {
// First, check for specific widening recipes that deal with inductions, Phi
// nodes, calls and memory operations.
VPRecipeBase *Recipe;
@@ -8538,7 +8514,7 @@ VPRecipeBuilder::tryToCreateWidenRecipe(Instruction *Instr,
recordRecipeOf(Phi);
if ((Recipe = tryToOptimizeInductionPHI(Phi, Operands, *Plan, Range)))
- return toVPRecipeResult(Recipe);
+ return Recipe;
VPHeaderPHIRecipe *PhiRecipe = nullptr;
assert((Legal->isReductionVariable(Phi) ||
@@ -8570,13 +8546,13 @@ VPRecipeBuilder::tryToCreateWidenRecipe(Instruction *Instr,
recordRecipeOf(Inc);
PhisToFix.push_back(PhiRecipe);
- return toVPRecipeResult(PhiRecipe);
+ return PhiRecipe;
}
if (isa<TruncInst>(Instr) &&
(Recipe = tryToOptimizeInductionTruncate(cast<TruncInst>(Instr), Operands,
Range, *Plan)))
- return toVPRecipeResult(Recipe);
+ return Recipe;
// All widen recipes below deal only with VF > 1.
if (LoopVectorizationPlanner::getDecisionAndClampRange(
@@ -8584,29 +8560,29 @@ VPRecipeBuilder::tryToCreateWidenRecipe(Instruction *Instr,
return nullptr;
if (auto *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(Instr))
- return toVPRecipeResult(tryToWidenCall(CI, Operands, Range, Plan));
+ return tryToWidenCall(CI, Operands, Range, Plan);
if (isa<LoadInst>(Instr) || isa<StoreInst>(Instr))
- return toVPRecipeResult(tryToWidenMemory(Instr, Operands, Range, Plan));
+ return tryToWidenMemory(Instr, Operands, Range, Plan);
if (!shouldWiden(Instr, Range))
return nullptr;
if (auto GEP = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Instr))
- return toVPRecipeResult(new VPWidenGEPRecipe(
- GEP, make_range(Operands.begin(), Operands.end())));
+ return new VPWidenGEPRecipe(GEP,
+ make_range(Operands.begin(), Operands.end()));
if (auto *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Instr)) {
- return toVPRecipeResult(new VPWidenSelectRecipe(
- *SI, make_range(Operands.begin(), Operands.end())));
+ return new VPWidenSelectRecipe(
+ *SI, make_range(Operands.begin(), Operands.end()));
}
if (auto *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(Instr)) {
- return toVPRecipeResult(new VPWidenCastRecipe(CI->getOpcode(), Operands[0],
- CI->getType(), *CI));
+ return new VPWidenCastRecipe(CI->getOpcode(), Operands[0], CI->getType(),
+ *CI);
}
- return toVPRecipeResult(tryToWiden(Instr, Operands, VPBB, Plan));
+ return tryToWiden(Instr, Operands, VPBB, Plan);
}
void LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlansWithVPRecipes(ElementCount MinVF,
@@ -8786,22 +8762,10 @@ LoopVectorizationPlanner::tryToBuildVPlanWithVPRecipes(VFRange &Range) {
Legal->isInvariantAddressOfReduction(SI->getPointerOperand()))
continue;
- auto RecipeOrValue = RecipeBuilder.tryToCreateWidenRecipe(
+ VPRecipeBase *Recipe = RecipeBuilder.tryToCreateWidenRecipe(
Instr, Operands, Range, VPBB, Plan);
- if (!RecipeOrValue)
- RecipeOrValue = RecipeBuilder.handleReplication(Instr, Range, *Plan);
- // If Instr can be simplified to an existing VPValue, use it.
- if (isa<VPValue *>(RecipeOrValue)) {
- auto *VPV = cast<VPValue *>(RecipeOrValue);
- Plan->addVPValue(Instr, VPV);
- // If the re-used value is a recipe, register the recipe for the
- // instruction, in case the recipe for Instr needs to be recorded.
- if (VPRecipeBase *R = VPV->getDefiningRecipe())
- RecipeBuilder.setRecipe(Instr, R);
- continue;
- }
- // Otherwise, add the new recipe.
- VPRecipeBase *Recipe = cast<VPRecipeBase *>(RecipeOrValue);
+ if (!Recipe)
+ Recipe = RecipeBuilder.handleReplication(Instr, Range, *Plan);
for (auto *Def : Recipe->definedValues()) {
auto *UV = Def->getUnderlyingValue();
Plan->addVPValue(UV, Def);
@@ -8966,10 +8930,10 @@ VPlanPtr LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlan(VFRange &Range) {
}
// Adjust the recipes for reductions. For in-loop reductions the chain of
-// instructions leading from the loop exit instr to the phi need to be converted
-// to reductions, with one operand being vector and the other being the scalar
-// reduction chain. For other reductions, a select is introduced between the phi
-// and live-out recipes when folding the tail.
+// instructions leading from the loop exit instr to the phi need to be
+// converted to reductions, with one operand being vector and the other
+// being the scalar reduction chain. For other reductions, a select is
+// introduced between the phi and live-out recipes when folding the tail.
void LoopVectorizationPlanner::adjustRecipesForReductions(
VPBasicBlock *LatchVPBB, VPlanPtr &Plan, VPRecipeBuilder &RecipeBuilder,
ElementCount MinVF) {
@@ -9079,6 +9043,9 @@ void LoopVectorizationPlanner::adjustRecipesForReductions(
LinkVPBB->insert(FMulRecipe, CurrentLink->getIterator());
VecOp = FMulRecipe;
} else {
+ if (PhiR->isInLoop() && isa<VPBlendRecipe>(CurrentLink))
+ continue;
+
if (RecurrenceDescriptor::isMinMaxRecurrenceKind(Kind)) {
if (isa<VPWidenRecipe>(CurrentLink)) {
assert(isa<CmpInst>(CurrentLinkI) &&
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPRecipeBuilder.h b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPRecipeBuilder.h
index 7ff6749a09089e9..0d8d7fc6f817709 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPRecipeBuilder.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPRecipeBuilder.h
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ class LoopVectorizationLegality;
class LoopVectorizationCostModel;
class TargetLibraryInfo;
-using VPRecipeOrVPValueTy = PointerUnion<VPRecipeBase *, VPValue *>;
-
/// Helper class to create VPRecipies from IR instructions.
class VPRecipeBuilder {
/// The loop that we evaluate.
@@ -88,8 +86,8 @@ class VPRecipeBuilder {
/// or a new VPBlendRecipe otherwise. Currently all such phi nodes are turned
/// into a sequence of select instructions as the vectorizer currently
/// performs full if-conversion.
- VPRecipeOrVPValueTy tryToBlend(PHINode *Phi, ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
- VPlanPtr &Plan);
+ VPBlendRecipe *tryToBlend(PHINode *Phi, ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
+ VPlanPtr &Plan);
/// Handle call instructions. If \p CI can be widened for \p Range.Start,
/// return a new VPWidenCallRecipe. Range.End may be decreased to ensure same
@@ -103,9 +101,6 @@ class VPRecipeBuilder {
VPRecipeBase *tryToWiden(Instruction *I, ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
VPBasicBlock *VPBB, VPlanPtr &Plan);
- /// Return a VPRecipeOrValueTy with VPRecipeBase * being set. This can be used to force the use as VPRecipeBase* for recipe sub-types that also inherit from VPValue.
- VPRecipeOrVPValueTy toVPRecipeResult(VPRecipeBase *R) const { return R; }
-
public:
VPRecipeBuilder(Loop *OrigLoop, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI,
LoopVectorizationLegality *Legal,
@@ -116,12 +111,11 @@ class VPRecipeBuilder {
/// Check if an existing VPValue can be used for \p Instr or a recipe can be
/// create for \p I withing the given VF \p Range. If an existing VPValue can
- /// be used or if a recipe can be created, return it. Otherwise return a
- /// VPRecipeOrVPValueTy with nullptr.
- VPRecipeOrVPValueTy tryToCreateWidenRecipe(Instruction *Instr,
- ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
- VFRange &Range, VPBasicBlock *VPBB,
- VPlanPtr &Plan);
+ /// be used or if a recipe can be created, return it.
+ VPRecipeBase *tryToCreateWidenRecipe(Instruction *Instr,
+ ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands,
+ VFRange &Range, VPBasicBlock *VPBB,
+ VPlanPtr &Plan);
/// Set the recipe created for given ingredient. This operation is a no-op for
/// ingredients that were not marked using a nullptr entry in the map.
@@ -165,8 +159,7 @@ class VPRecipeBuilder {
/// Build a VPReplicationRecipe for \p I. If it is predicated, add the mask as
/// last operand. Range.End may be decreased to ensure same recipe behavior
/// from \p Range.Start to \p Range.End.
- VPRecipeOrVPValueTy handleReplication(Instruction *I, VFRange &Range,
- VPlan &Plan);
+ VPRecipeBase *handleReplication(Instruction *I, VFRange &Range, VPlan &Plan);
/// Add the incoming values from the backedge to reduction & first-order
/// recurrence cross-iteration phis.
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp
index 33132880d5a444d..317d7806bf55119 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp
@@ -806,6 +806,38 @@ static unsigned getOpcodeForRecipe(VPRecipeBase &R) {
/// Try to simplify recipe \p R.
static void simplifyRecipe(VPRecipeBase &R, VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo) {
+ // Try to remove redundant blend recipes.
+ if (auto *Blend = dyn_cast<VPBlendRecipe>(&R)) {
+ if (Blend->getNumIncomingValues() == 1) {
+ Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(0));
+ Blend->eraseFromParent();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ bool AllEqual = true;
+ for (unsigned I = 1; I != Blend->getNumIncomingValues(); ++I)
+ AllEqual &= Blend->getIncomingValue(0) == Blend->getIncomingValue(I);
+ if (AllEqual) {
+ Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(0));
+ Blend->eraseFromParent();
+ return;
+ }
+ if (Blend->getNumIncomingValues() != 2)
+ return;
+ auto IsInLoopReduction = [](VPValue *VPV) {
+ auto *PhiR = dyn_cast<VPReductionPHIRecipe>(VPV);
+ return PhiR && PhiR->isInLoop();
+ };
+ if (IsInLoopReduction(Blend->getIncomingValue(0))) {
+ Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(1));
+ Blend->eraseFromParent();
+ } else if (IsInLoopReduction(Blend->getIncomingValue(1))) {
+ Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(0));
+ Blend->eraseFromParent();
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
switch (getOpcodeForRecipe(R)) {
case Instruction::Mul: {
VPValue *A = R.getOperand(0);
@@ -996,8 +1028,8 @@ void VPlanTransforms::optimize(VPlan &Plan, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
removeRedundantCanonicalIVs(Plan);
removeRedundantInductionCasts(Plan);
- optimizeInductions(Plan, SE);
simplifyRecipes(Plan, SE.getContext());
+ optimizeInductions(Plan, SE);
removeDeadRecipes(Plan);
createAndOptimizeReplicateRegions(Plan);
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h
index 3bf91115debb7d5..7ce2e5974f60b02 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h
@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ struct VPlanTransforms {
/// Remove redundant EpxandSCEVRecipes in \p Plan's entry block by replacing
/// them with already existing recipes expanding the same SCEV expression.
static void removeRedundantExpandSCEVRecipes(VPlan &Plan);
-
};
} // namespace llvm
>From 96fcdc546bb06a9ec545f64339c7843a903f2198 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn <flo at fhahn.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:01:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] !fixup address latest comments, thanks
---
.../Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | 11 ++++++++++-
.../Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp | 19 -------------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
index acfe0138c64e7c5..8907fda56025df5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
@@ -8963,8 +8963,17 @@ void LoopVectorizationPlanner::adjustRecipesForReductions(
LinkVPBB->insert(FMulRecipe, CurrentLink->getIterator());
VecOp = FMulRecipe;
} else {
- if (PhiR->isInLoop() && isa<VPBlendRecipe>(CurrentLink))
+ auto *Blend = dyn_cast<VPBlendRecipe>(CurrentLink);
+ if (PhiR->isInLoop() && Blend) {
+ assert(Blend->getNumIncomingValues() == 2);
+ assert(any_of(Blend->operands(),
+ [PhiR](VPValue *Op) { return Op == PhiR; }));
+ if (Blend->getIncomingValue(0) == PhiR)
+ Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(1));
+ else
+ Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(0));
continue;
+ }
if (RecurrenceDescriptor::isMinMaxRecurrenceKind(Kind)) {
if (isa<VPWidenRecipe>(CurrentLink)) {
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp
index 19223a4da67b3d1..dc41454e48fd7df 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp
@@ -808,12 +808,6 @@ static unsigned getOpcodeForRecipe(VPRecipeBase &R) {
static void simplifyRecipe(VPRecipeBase &R, VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo) {
// Try to remove redundant blend recipes.
if (auto *Blend = dyn_cast<VPBlendRecipe>(&R)) {
- if (Blend->getNumIncomingValues() == 1) {
- Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(0));
- Blend->eraseFromParent();
- return;
- }
-
bool AllEqual = true;
for (unsigned I = 1; I != Blend->getNumIncomingValues(); ++I)
AllEqual &= Blend->getIncomingValue(0) == Blend->getIncomingValue(I);
@@ -822,19 +816,6 @@ static void simplifyRecipe(VPRecipeBase &R, VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo) {
Blend->eraseFromParent();
return;
}
- if (Blend->getNumIncomingValues() != 2)
- return;
- auto IsInLoopReduction = [](VPValue *VPV) {
- auto *PhiR = dyn_cast<VPReductionPHIRecipe>(VPV);
- return PhiR && PhiR->isInLoop();
- };
- if (IsInLoopReduction(Blend->getIncomingValue(0))) {
- Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(1));
- Blend->eraseFromParent();
- } else if (IsInLoopReduction(Blend->getIncomingValue(1))) {
- Blend->replaceAllUsesWith(Blend->getIncomingValue(0));
- Blend->eraseFromParent();
- }
return;
}
>From 8627dd4c97f5be9857becdd9081779c2644be0fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn <flo at fhahn.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:03:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] !fiuxp re-add newline.
---
llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h
index 7ce2e5974f60b02..3bf91115debb7d5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.h
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct VPlanTransforms {
/// Remove redundant EpxandSCEVRecipes in \p Plan's entry block by replacing
/// them with already existing recipes expanding the same SCEV expression.
static void removeRedundantExpandSCEVRecipes(VPlan &Plan);
+
};
} // namespace llvm
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list