[flang-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Fix construct privatization in default clause (PR #72510)
via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 24 03:20:00 PDT 2024
================
@@ -268,21 +268,39 @@ void DataSharingProcessor::insertLastPrivateCompare(mlir::Operation *op) {
firOpBuilder.restoreInsertionPoint(localInsPt);
}
+void DataSharingProcessor::collectSymbolsInNestedRegions(
+ Fortran::lower::pft::Evaluation &eval,
+ Fortran::semantics::Symbol::Flag flag,
+ llvm::SetVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *>
+ &symbolsInNestedRegions) {
+ for (Fortran::lower::pft::Evaluation &nestedEval :
+ eval.getNestedEvaluations()) {
+ if (nestedEval.hasNestedEvaluations()) {
+ if (nestedEval.isConstruct())
+ // Recursively look for OpenMP constructs within `nestedEval`'s region
----------------
NimishMishra wrote:
Ideally, we want to capture symbols within nested OpenMP constructs in `symbolsInNestedRegions`.
In this case, the current evaluation is a non-OpenMP construct (like `do`). This recursive calls intends to find if there are any OpenMP constructs within this outer non-OpenMP construct.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72510
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list