[flang-commits] [flang] [mlir] [mlir][math] Replace roundeven call by nearbyint call when target does not have C23 features (PR #88687)
Frederik Harwath via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 15 07:24:05 PDT 2024
================
@@ -185,8 +186,15 @@ void mlir::populateMathToLibmConversionPatterns(RewritePatternSet &patterns) {
populatePatternsForOp<math::Log10Op>(patterns, ctx, "log10f", "log10");
populatePatternsForOp<math::Log1pOp>(patterns, ctx, "log1pf", "log1p");
populatePatternsForOp<math::PowFOp>(patterns, ctx, "powf", "pow");
- populatePatternsForOp<math::RoundEvenOp>(patterns, ctx, "roundevenf",
- "roundeven");
+ if (options.allowC23Features)
+ populatePatternsForOp<math::RoundEvenOp>(patterns, ctx, "roundevenf",
+ "roundeven");
+ else if (options.roundingModeIsDefault)
+ populatePatternsForOp<math::RoundEvenOp>(patterns, ctx, "nearbyintf",
+ "nearbyint");
+ // Roundeven: using nearbyint (pre-C23) for roundeven requires the
----------------
frederik-h wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. So I assume that using `nearbyint` instead of `roundeven` should be equivalent as long as no one changes the rounding mode? Or are there other semantics differences? I am wondering if you could handle this in your frontend if there was a `nearbyint` in the math dialect? Not sure if that's better though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88687
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list