[flang-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Fix construct privatization in default clause (PR #72510)
Kiran Chandramohan via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 15 07:20:19 PDT 2024
================
@@ -268,21 +268,39 @@ void DataSharingProcessor::insertLastPrivateCompare(mlir::Operation *op) {
firOpBuilder.restoreInsertionPoint(localInsPt);
}
+void DataSharingProcessor::collectSymbolsInNestedRegions(
+ Fortran::lower::pft::Evaluation &eval,
+ Fortran::semantics::Symbol::Flag flag,
+ llvm::SetVector<const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *>
+ &symbolsInNestedRegions) {
+ for (Fortran::lower::pft::Evaluation &nestedEval :
+ eval.getNestedEvaluations()) {
+ if (nestedEval.hasNestedEvaluations()) {
+ if (nestedEval.isConstruct())
+ // Recursively look for OpenMP constructs within `nestedEval`'s region
+ collectSymbolsInNestedRegions(nestedEval, flag, symbolsInNestedRegions);
+ else
+ converter.collectSymbolSet(nestedEval, symbolsInNestedRegions, flag,
+ /*collectSymbols=*/true,
+ /*collectHostAssociatedSymbols=*/false);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Collect symbols to be default privatized in two steps.
+// In step 1, collect all symbols in `eval` that match `flag`
+// into `defaultSymbols`.
+// In step 2, for nested constructs (if any), if and only if
+// the nested construct is an OpenMP construct, collect those nested
----------------
kiranchandramohan wrote:
Do you mean if it `not` an OpenMP construct?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72510
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list