[flang-commits] [flang] [flang][openacc] Avoid privatizing symbols during semantics (PR #69506)
via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 18 12:59:55 PDT 2023
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-openacc
Author: Razvan Lupusoru (razvanlupusoru)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
During flang handling of semantics of OpenACC private/firstprivate/ reduction clauses (including the implicitly private loop IV), a new scoped symbol was being created. This could lead to ambiguity in the lowered FIR - aka having multiple fir.declare for the same symbol. Because lowering of OpenACC does not materialize the meaning of the private clauses (by actually creating a scoped local symbol), it does not make sense to create a new symbol in semantics either.
I updated the acc-symbols01.f90 test to reflect this updated approach. Technically, the test could be removed, but it made sense to keep in place to highlight this intentional decision.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69506.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp (+8-33)
- (modified) flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-symbols01.f90 (+4-4)
``````````diff
diff --git a/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp b/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp
index 7c8fdb651af9fdd..e8448a36a7b273c 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp
@@ -254,9 +254,6 @@ class AccAttributeVisitor : DirectiveAttributeVisitor<llvm::acc::Directive> {
Symbol::Flag::AccCopyIn, Symbol::Flag::AccCopyOut,
Symbol::Flag::AccDelete, Symbol::Flag::AccPresent};
- Symbol::Flags accFlagsRequireNewSymbol{Symbol::Flag::AccPrivate,
- Symbol::Flag::AccFirstPrivate, Symbol::Flag::AccReduction};
-
Symbol::Flags accDataMvtFlags{
Symbol::Flag::AccDevice, Symbol::Flag::AccHost, Symbol::Flag::AccSelf};
@@ -266,7 +263,7 @@ class AccAttributeVisitor : DirectiveAttributeVisitor<llvm::acc::Directive> {
Symbol::Flag::AccDevicePtr, Symbol::Flag::AccDeviceResident,
Symbol::Flag::AccLink, Symbol::Flag::AccPresent};
- void PrivatizeAssociatedLoopIndex(const parser::OpenACCLoopConstruct &);
+ void CheckAssociatedLoopIndex(const parser::OpenACCLoopConstruct &);
void ResolveAccObjectList(const parser::AccObjectList &, Symbol::Flag);
void ResolveAccObject(const parser::AccObject &, Symbol::Flag);
Symbol *ResolveAcc(const parser::Name &, Symbol::Flag, Scope &);
@@ -877,7 +874,7 @@ bool AccAttributeVisitor::Pre(const parser::OpenACCLoopConstruct &x) {
}
ClearDataSharingAttributeObjects();
SetContextAssociatedLoopLevel(GetAssociatedLoopLevelFromClauses(clauseList));
- PrivatizeAssociatedLoopIndex(x);
+ CheckAssociatedLoopIndex(x);
return true;
}
@@ -1141,13 +1138,12 @@ std::int64_t AccAttributeVisitor::GetAssociatedLoopLevelFromClauses(
return 1; // default is outermost loop
}
-void AccAttributeVisitor::PrivatizeAssociatedLoopIndex(
+void AccAttributeVisitor::CheckAssociatedLoopIndex(
const parser::OpenACCLoopConstruct &x) {
std::int64_t level{GetContext().associatedLoopLevel};
- if (level <= 0) { // collpase value was negative or 0
+ if (level <= 0) { // collapse value was negative or 0
return;
}
- Symbol::Flag ivDSA{Symbol::Flag::AccPrivate};
const auto getNextDoConstruct =
[this](const parser::Block &block) -> const parser::DoConstruct * {
@@ -1166,16 +1162,8 @@ void AccAttributeVisitor::PrivatizeAssociatedLoopIndex(
const auto &outer{std::get<std::optional<parser::DoConstruct>>(x.t)};
for (const parser::DoConstruct *loop{&*outer}; loop && level > 0; --level) {
- // go through all the nested do-loops and resolve index variables
- const parser::Name *iv{GetLoopIndex(*loop)};
- if (iv) {
- if (auto *symbol{ResolveAcc(*iv, ivDSA, currScope())}) {
- symbol->set(Symbol::Flag::AccPreDetermined);
- iv->symbol = symbol; // adjust the symbol within region
- AddToContextObjectWithDSA(*symbol, ivDSA);
- }
- }
-
+ // Go through all nested loops to ensure index variable exists.
+ GetLoopIndex(*loop);
const auto &block{std::get<parser::Block>(loop->t)};
loop = getNextDoConstruct(block);
}
@@ -1328,20 +1316,12 @@ void AccAttributeVisitor::ResolveAccObject(
Symbol *AccAttributeVisitor::ResolveAcc(
const parser::Name &name, Symbol::Flag accFlag, Scope &scope) {
- if (accFlagsRequireNewSymbol.test(accFlag)) {
- return DeclarePrivateAccessEntity(name, accFlag, scope);
- } else {
- return DeclareOrMarkOtherAccessEntity(name, accFlag);
- }
+ return DeclareOrMarkOtherAccessEntity(name, accFlag);
}
Symbol *AccAttributeVisitor::ResolveAcc(
Symbol &symbol, Symbol::Flag accFlag, Scope &scope) {
- if (accFlagsRequireNewSymbol.test(accFlag)) {
- return DeclarePrivateAccessEntity(symbol, accFlag, scope);
- } else {
- return DeclareOrMarkOtherAccessEntity(symbol, accFlag);
- }
+ return DeclareOrMarkOtherAccessEntity(symbol, accFlag);
}
Symbol *AccAttributeVisitor::DeclareOrMarkOtherAccessEntity(
@@ -1374,11 +1354,6 @@ static bool WithMultipleAppearancesAccException(
void AccAttributeVisitor::CheckMultipleAppearances(
const parser::Name &name, const Symbol &symbol, Symbol::Flag accFlag) {
const auto *target{&symbol};
- if (accFlagsRequireNewSymbol.test(accFlag)) {
- if (const auto *details{symbol.detailsIf<HostAssocDetails>()}) {
- target = &details->symbol();
- }
- }
if (HasDataSharingAttributeObject(*target) &&
!WithMultipleAppearancesAccException(symbol, accFlag)) {
context_.Say(name.source,
diff --git a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-symbols01.f90 b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-symbols01.f90
index ddb87711eecc5e0..375445bad13a54f 100644
--- a/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-symbols01.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Semantics/OpenACC/acc-symbols01.f90
@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ program mm
b = 2
!$acc parallel present(c) firstprivate(b) private(a)
!$acc loop
- !DEF: /mm/OtherConstruct1/i (AccPrivate, AccPreDetermined) HostAssoc INTEGER(4)
+ !REF: /mm/i
do i=1,10
- !DEF: /mm/OtherConstruct1/a (AccPrivate) HostAssoc INTEGER(4)
- !REF: /mm/OtherConstruct1/i
- !DEF: /mm/OtherConstruct1/b (AccFirstPrivate) HostAssoc INTEGER(4)
+ !REF: /mm/a
+ !REF: /mm/i
+ !REF: /mm/b
a(i) = b(i)
end do
!$acc end parallel
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69506
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list