[flang-commits] [flang] [openmp] [mlir] [Flang][OpenMP] Initial mapping of Fortran pointers and allocatables for target devices (PR #71766)

[via flang-commits]

================
@@ -1710,30 +1710,82 @@ bool ClauseProcessor::processLink(
 
 static mlir::omp::MapInfoOp
 createMapInfoOp(fir::FirOpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc,
-                mlir::Value baseAddr, std::stringstream &name,
-                mlir::SmallVector<mlir::Value> bounds, uint64_t mapType,
-                mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKind mapCaptureType,
-                mlir::Type retTy) {
-  mlir::Value varPtr, varPtrPtr;
-  mlir::TypeAttr varType;
-
+                mlir::Value baseAddr, mlir::Value varPtrPtr, std::string name,
+                mlir::SmallVector<mlir::Value> bounds,
+                mlir::SmallVector<mlir::Value> members, uint64_t mapType,
+                mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKind mapCaptureType, mlir::Type retTy,
+                bool isVal = false) {
   if (auto boxTy = baseAddr.getType().dyn_cast<fir::BaseBoxType>()) {
     baseAddr = builder.create<fir::BoxAddrOp>(loc, baseAddr);
     retTy = baseAddr.getType();
   }
 
-  varPtr = baseAddr;
-  varType = mlir::TypeAttr::get(
+  mlir::TypeAttr varType = mlir::TypeAttr::get(
       llvm::cast<mlir::omp::PointerLikeType>(retTy).getElementType());
 
   mlir::omp::MapInfoOp op = builder.create<mlir::omp::MapInfoOp>(
-      loc, retTy, varPtr, varType, varPtrPtr, bounds,
+      loc, retTy, baseAddr, varType, varPtrPtr, members, bounds,
       builder.getIntegerAttr(builder.getIntegerType(64, false), mapType),
       builder.getAttr<mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKindAttr>(mapCaptureType),
-      builder.getStringAttr(name.str()));
+      builder.getStringAttr(name));
+
   return op;
 }
 
+static mlir::omp::MapInfoOp processDescriptorTypeMappings(
+    Fortran::semantics::SemanticsContext &semanticsContext,
+    Fortran::lower::StatementContext &stmtCtx,
+    Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter &converter, mlir::Location loc,
+    mlir::Value descriptorAddr, mlir::Value descDataBaseAddr,
+    mlir::SmallVector<mlir::Value> &bounds, std::string asFortran,
+    llvm::omp::OpenMPOffloadMappingFlags mapCaptureType) {
+  llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> descriptorBaseAddrMembers;
+  fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
+
+  mlir::Value descriptor = descriptorAddr;
+  if (fir::isAssumedShape(fir::unwrapRefType(descriptorAddr.getType()))) {
+    mlir::OpBuilder::InsertPoint insPt = firOpBuilder.saveInsertionPoint();
+    firOpBuilder.setInsertionPointToStart(firOpBuilder.getAllocaBlock());
+    descriptor =
+        firOpBuilder.create<fir::AllocaOp>(loc, descriptorAddr.getType());
+    firOpBuilder.restoreInsertionPoint(insPt);
+    firOpBuilder.create<fir::StoreOp>(loc, descriptorAddr, descriptor);
+  }
+
+  mlir::Value baseAddrAddr = firOpBuilder.create<fir::BoxOffsetOp>(
+      loc, descriptor, fir::BoxFieldAttr::base_addr);
+
+  descriptorBaseAddrMembers.push_back(createMapInfoOp(
+      firOpBuilder, loc, descDataBaseAddr, baseAddrAddr, asFortran, bounds, {},
+      static_cast<std::underlying_type_t<llvm::omp::OpenMPOffloadMappingFlags>>(
+          mapCaptureType),
+      mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKind::ByRef, descDataBaseAddr.getType()));
+
+  if (fir::BaseBoxType baseBoxTy = llvm::dyn_cast<fir::BaseBoxType>(
+          fir::unwrapRefType(descriptor.getType()))) {
+    if (fir::boxHasAddendum(baseBoxTy)) {
+      mlir::Value addendumAddrAddr = firOpBuilder.create<fir::BoxOffsetOp>(
+          loc, descriptor, fir::BoxFieldAttr::derived_type);
+      // NOTE: We have no addendumAddr, but we must provide a varPtr alongside
+      // the varPtrPtr so we replicate it across the two for now.
+      descriptorBaseAddrMembers.push_back(createMapInfoOp(
+          firOpBuilder, loc, addendumAddrAddr, addendumAddrAddr, asFortran, {},
+          {},
+          static_cast<
+              std::underlying_type_t<llvm::omp::OpenMPOffloadMappingFlags>>(
+              mapCaptureType),
+          mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKind::ByRef, addendumAddrAddr.getType()));
+    }
----------------
agozillon wrote:

I'd be happy to do that, I've not found a test case where it's required just yet (but if anyone knows of one, please do post it here, so I can look into it) and it might overcomplicate the current PR further.  

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71766