[flang-commits] [flang] b9bc64b - [fir] Add complex operations conversion from FIR LLVM IR
Valentin Clement via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 9 02:05:37 PST 2021
Author: Valentin Clement
Date: 2021-11-09T11:05:29+01:00
New Revision: b9bc64ba147fb90c199c56ec644e24fcabe74a5c
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b9bc64ba147fb90c199c56ec644e24fcabe74a5c
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b9bc64ba147fb90c199c56ec644e24fcabe74a5c.diff
LOG: [fir] Add complex operations conversion from FIR LLVM IR
This patch add conversion for primitive operations on complex types.
- fir.addc
- fir.subc
- fir.mulc
- fir.divc
- fir.negc
This adds also the type conversion for !fir.complex<KIND> type.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113434
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier at nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz at nvidia.com>
Added:
Modified:
flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp
flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp
flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.h
flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/TypeConverter.h
flang/test/Fir/convert-to-llvm.fir
flang/test/Fir/types-to-llvm.fir
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp
index 4a0a7266a2f5..eda4f7ffbb8c 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include "PassDetail.h"
#include "flang/Optimizer/Dialect/FIROps.h"
#include "flang/Optimizer/Dialect/FIRType.h"
+#include "flang/Optimizer/Support/FIRContext.h"
#include "mlir/Conversion/ArithmeticToLLVM/ArithmeticToLLVM.h"
#include "mlir/Conversion/LLVMCommon/Pattern.h"
#include "mlir/Conversion/LLVMCommon/TypeConverter.h"
@@ -487,6 +488,175 @@ struct InsertOnRangeOpConversion
return success();
}
};
+
+static mlir::Type getComplexEleTy(mlir::Type complex) {
+ if (auto cc = complex.dyn_cast<mlir::ComplexType>())
+ return cc.getElementType();
+ return complex.cast<fir::ComplexType>().getElementType();
+}
+
+//
+// Primitive operations on Complex types
+//
+
+/// Generate inline code for complex addition/subtraction
+template <typename LLVMOP, typename OPTY>
+mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp complexSum(OPTY sumop, mlir::ValueRange opnds,
+ mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter,
+ fir::LLVMTypeConverter &lowering) {
+ mlir::Value a = opnds[0];
+ mlir::Value b = opnds[1];
+ auto loc = sumop.getLoc();
+ auto ctx = sumop.getContext();
+ auto c0 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctx, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(0));
+ auto c1 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctx, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(1));
+ mlir::Type eleTy = lowering.convertType(getComplexEleTy(sumop.getType()));
+ mlir::Type ty = lowering.convertType(sumop.getType());
+ auto x0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, a, c0);
+ auto y0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, a, c1);
+ auto x1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, b, c0);
+ auto y1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, b, c1);
+ auto rx = rewriter.create<LLVMOP>(loc, eleTy, x0, x1);
+ auto ry = rewriter.create<LLVMOP>(loc, eleTy, y0, y1);
+ auto r0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::UndefOp>(loc, ty);
+ auto r1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(loc, ty, r0, rx, c0);
+ return rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(loc, ty, r1, ry, c1);
+}
+
+struct AddcOpConversion : public FIROpConversion<fir::AddcOp> {
+ using FIROpConversion::FIROpConversion;
+
+ mlir::LogicalResult
+ matchAndRewrite(fir::AddcOp addc, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+ mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+ // given: (x + iy) + (x' + iy')
+ // result: (x + x') + i(y + y')
+ auto r = complexSum<mlir::LLVM::FAddOp>(addc, adaptor.getOperands(),
+ rewriter, lowerTy());
+ rewriter.replaceOp(addc, r.getResult());
+ return success();
+ }
+};
+
+struct SubcOpConversion : public FIROpConversion<fir::SubcOp> {
+ using FIROpConversion::FIROpConversion;
+
+ mlir::LogicalResult
+ matchAndRewrite(fir::SubcOp subc, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+ mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+ // given: (x + iy) - (x' + iy')
+ // result: (x - x') + i(y - y')
+ auto r = complexSum<mlir::LLVM::FSubOp>(subc, adaptor.getOperands(),
+ rewriter, lowerTy());
+ rewriter.replaceOp(subc, r.getResult());
+ return success();
+ }
+};
+
+/// Inlined complex multiply
+struct MulcOpConversion : public FIROpConversion<fir::MulcOp> {
+ using FIROpConversion::FIROpConversion;
+
+ mlir::LogicalResult
+ matchAndRewrite(fir::MulcOp mulc, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+ mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+ // TODO: Can we use a call to __muldc3 ?
+ // given: (x + iy) * (x' + iy')
+ // result: (xx'-yy')+i(xy'+yx')
+ mlir::Value a = adaptor.getOperands()[0];
+ mlir::Value b = adaptor.getOperands()[1];
+ auto loc = mulc.getLoc();
+ auto *ctx = mulc.getContext();
+ auto c0 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctx, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(0));
+ auto c1 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctx, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(1));
+ mlir::Type eleTy = convertType(getComplexEleTy(mulc.getType()));
+ mlir::Type ty = convertType(mulc.getType());
+ auto x0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, a, c0);
+ auto y0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, a, c1);
+ auto x1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, b, c0);
+ auto y1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, b, c1);
+ auto xx = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, x0, x1);
+ auto yx = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, y0, x1);
+ auto xy = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, x0, y1);
+ auto ri = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FAddOp>(loc, eleTy, xy, yx);
+ auto yy = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, y0, y1);
+ auto rr = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FSubOp>(loc, eleTy, xx, yy);
+ auto ra = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::UndefOp>(loc, ty);
+ auto r1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(loc, ty, ra, rr, c0);
+ auto r0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(loc, ty, r1, ri, c1);
+ rewriter.replaceOp(mulc, r0.getResult());
+ return success();
+ }
+};
+
+/// Inlined complex division
+struct DivcOpConversion : public FIROpConversion<fir::DivcOp> {
+ using FIROpConversion::FIROpConversion;
+
+ mlir::LogicalResult
+ matchAndRewrite(fir::DivcOp divc, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+ mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+ // TODO: Can we use a call to __divdc3 instead?
+ // Just generate inline code for now.
+ // given: (x + iy) / (x' + iy')
+ // result: ((xx'+yy')/d) + i((yx'-xy')/d) where d = x'x' + y'y'
+ mlir::Value a = adaptor.getOperands()[0];
+ mlir::Value b = adaptor.getOperands()[1];
+ auto loc = divc.getLoc();
+ auto *ctx = divc.getContext();
+ auto c0 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctx, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(0));
+ auto c1 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctx, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(1));
+ mlir::Type eleTy = convertType(getComplexEleTy(divc.getType()));
+ mlir::Type ty = convertType(divc.getType());
+ auto x0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, a, c0);
+ auto y0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, a, c1);
+ auto x1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, b, c0);
+ auto y1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, b, c1);
+ auto xx = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, x0, x1);
+ auto x1x1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, x1, x1);
+ auto yx = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, y0, x1);
+ auto xy = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, x0, y1);
+ auto yy = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, y0, y1);
+ auto y1y1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FMulOp>(loc, eleTy, y1, y1);
+ auto d = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FAddOp>(loc, eleTy, x1x1, y1y1);
+ auto rrn = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FAddOp>(loc, eleTy, xx, yy);
+ auto rin = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FSubOp>(loc, eleTy, yx, xy);
+ auto rr = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FDivOp>(loc, eleTy, rrn, d);
+ auto ri = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FDivOp>(loc, eleTy, rin, d);
+ auto ra = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::UndefOp>(loc, ty);
+ auto r1 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(loc, ty, ra, rr, c0);
+ auto r0 = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(loc, ty, r1, ri, c1);
+ rewriter.replaceOp(divc, r0.getResult());
+ return success();
+ }
+};
+
+/// Inlined complex negation
+struct NegcOpConversion : public FIROpConversion<fir::NegcOp> {
+ using FIROpConversion::FIROpConversion;
+
+ mlir::LogicalResult
+ matchAndRewrite(fir::NegcOp neg, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+ mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+ // given: -(x + iy)
+ // result: -x - iy
+ auto *ctxt = neg.getContext();
+ auto eleTy = convertType(getComplexEleTy(neg.getType()));
+ auto ty = convertType(neg.getType());
+ auto loc = neg.getLoc();
+ mlir::Value o0 = adaptor.getOperands()[0];
+ auto c0 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctxt, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(0));
+ auto c1 = mlir::ArrayAttr::get(ctxt, rewriter.getI32IntegerAttr(1));
+ auto rp = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, o0, c0);
+ auto ip = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::ExtractValueOp>(loc, eleTy, o0, c1);
+ auto nrp = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FNegOp>(loc, eleTy, rp);
+ auto nip = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::FNegOp>(loc, eleTy, ip);
+ auto r = rewriter.create<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(loc, ty, o0, nrp, c0);
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<mlir::LLVM::InsertValueOp>(neg, ty, r, nip, c1);
+ return success();
+ }
+};
+
} // namespace
namespace {
@@ -504,12 +674,13 @@ class FIRToLLVMLowering : public fir::FIRToLLVMLoweringBase<FIRToLLVMLowering> {
auto *context = getModule().getContext();
fir::LLVMTypeConverter typeConverter{getModule()};
mlir::OwningRewritePatternList pattern(context);
- pattern.insert<
- AddrOfOpConversion, CallOpConversion, ExtractValueOpConversion,
- HasValueOpConversion, GlobalOpConversion, InsertOnRangeOpConversion,
- InsertValueOpConversion, SelectOpConversion, SelectRankOpConversion,
- UndefOpConversion, UnreachableOpConversion, ZeroOpConversion>(
- typeConverter);
+ pattern.insert<AddcOpConversion, AddrOfOpConversion, CallOpConversion,
+ DivcOpConversion, ExtractValueOpConversion,
+ HasValueOpConversion, GlobalOpConversion,
+ InsertOnRangeOpConversion, InsertValueOpConversion,
+ NegcOpConversion, MulcOpConversion, SelectOpConversion,
+ SelectRankOpConversion, SubcOpConversion, UndefOpConversion,
+ UnreachableOpConversion, ZeroOpConversion>(typeConverter);
mlir::populateStdToLLVMConversionPatterns(typeConverter, pattern);
mlir::arith::populateArithmeticToLLVMConversionPatterns(typeConverter,
pattern);
diff --git a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp
index 78e52b911038..0541de2ddf7b 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp
@@ -35,6 +35,13 @@ struct GenericTarget : public CodeGenSpecifics {
using CodeGenSpecifics::CodeGenSpecifics;
using AT = CodeGenSpecifics::Attributes;
+ mlir::Type complexMemoryType(mlir::Type eleTy) const override {
+ assert(fir::isa_real(eleTy));
+ // { t, t } struct of 2 eleTy
+ mlir::TypeRange range = {eleTy, eleTy};
+ return mlir::TupleType::get(eleTy.getContext(), range);
+ }
+
Marshalling boxcharArgumentType(mlir::Type eleTy, bool sret) const override {
CodeGenSpecifics::Marshalling marshal;
auto idxTy = mlir::IntegerType::get(eleTy.getContext(), S::defaultWidth);
diff --git a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.h b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.h
index eb9c93dff97f..af4004ce7370 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.h
+++ b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.h
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ class CodeGenSpecifics {
CodeGenSpecifics() = delete;
virtual ~CodeGenSpecifics() {}
+ /// Type presentation of a `complex<ele>` type value in memory.
+ virtual mlir::Type complexMemoryType(mlir::Type eleTy) const = 0;
+
/// Type representation of a `complex<eleTy>` type argument when passed by
/// value. An argument value may need to be passed as a (safe) reference
/// argument.
diff --git a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/TypeConverter.h b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/TypeConverter.h
index f8d651808b02..f4d252dfc7ee 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/TypeConverter.h
+++ b/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/TypeConverter.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#define FORTRAN_OPTIMIZER_CODEGEN_TYPECONVERTER_H
#include "DescriptorModel.h"
+#include "Target.h"
#include "flang/Lower/Todo.h" // remove when TODO's are done
#include "flang/Optimizer/Support/FIRContext.h"
#include "flang/Optimizer/Support/KindMapping.h"
@@ -28,7 +29,10 @@ class LLVMTypeConverter : public mlir::LLVMTypeConverter {
public:
LLVMTypeConverter(mlir::ModuleOp module)
: mlir::LLVMTypeConverter(module.getContext()),
- kindMapping(getKindMapping(module)) {
+ kindMapping(getKindMapping(module)),
+ specifics(CodeGenSpecifics::get(module.getContext(),
+ getTargetTriple(module),
+ getKindMapping(module))) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "FIR type converter\n");
// Each conversion should return a value of type mlir::Type.
@@ -39,6 +43,10 @@ class LLVMTypeConverter : public mlir::LLVMTypeConverter {
});
addConversion(
[&](fir::RecordType derived) { return convertRecordType(derived); });
+ addConversion(
+ [&](fir::ComplexType cmplx) { return convertComplexType(cmplx); });
+ addConversion(
+ [&](fir::RealType real) { return convertRealType(real.getFKind()); });
addConversion(
[&](fir::ReferenceType ref) { return convertPointerLike(ref); });
addConversion(
@@ -140,6 +148,24 @@ class LLVMTypeConverter : public mlir::LLVMTypeConverter {
/*isPacked=*/false));
}
+ // Use the target specifics to figure out how to map complex to LLVM IR. The
+ // use of complex values in function signatures is handled before conversion
+ // to LLVM IR dialect here.
+ //
+ // fir.complex<T> | std.complex<T> --> llvm<"{t,t}">
+ template <typename C>
+ mlir::Type convertComplexType(C cmplx) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "type convert: " << cmplx << '\n');
+ auto eleTy = cmplx.getElementType();
+ return convertType(specifics->complexMemoryType(eleTy));
+ }
+
+ // convert a front-end kind value to either a std or LLVM IR dialect type
+ // fir.real<n> --> llvm.anyfloat where anyfloat is a kind mapping
+ mlir::Type convertRealType(fir::KindTy kind) {
+ return fromRealTypeID(kindMapping.getRealTypeID(kind), kind);
+ }
+
template <typename A>
mlir::Type convertPointerLike(A &ty) {
mlir::Type eleTy = ty.getEleTy();
@@ -187,8 +213,33 @@ class LLVMTypeConverter : public mlir::LLVMTypeConverter {
return mlir::LLVM::LLVMPointerType::get(baseTy);
}
+ /// Convert llvm::Type::TypeID to mlir::Type
+ mlir::Type fromRealTypeID(llvm::Type::TypeID typeID, fir::KindTy kind) {
+ switch (typeID) {
+ case llvm::Type::TypeID::HalfTyID:
+ return mlir::FloatType::getF16(&getContext());
+ case llvm::Type::TypeID::BFloatTyID:
+ return mlir::FloatType::getBF16(&getContext());
+ case llvm::Type::TypeID::FloatTyID:
+ return mlir::FloatType::getF32(&getContext());
+ case llvm::Type::TypeID::DoubleTyID:
+ return mlir::FloatType::getF64(&getContext());
+ case llvm::Type::TypeID::X86_FP80TyID:
+ return mlir::FloatType::getF80(&getContext());
+ case llvm::Type::TypeID::FP128TyID:
+ return mlir::FloatType::getF128(&getContext());
+ default:
+ emitError(UnknownLoc::get(&getContext()))
+ << "unsupported type: !fir.real<" << kind << ">";
+ return {};
+ }
+ }
+
+ KindMapping &getKindMap() { return kindMapping; }
+
private:
KindMapping kindMapping;
+ std::unique_ptr<CodeGenSpecifics> specifics;
};
} // namespace fir
diff --git a/flang/test/Fir/convert-to-llvm.fir b/flang/test/Fir/convert-to-llvm.fir
index 9d8b9bb1a7a7..ec44e97f0eb9 100644
--- a/flang/test/Fir/convert-to-llvm.fir
+++ b/flang/test/Fir/convert-to-llvm.fir
@@ -376,3 +376,137 @@ func @test_call_return_val() -> i32 {
// CHECK-NEXT: %0 = llvm.call @dummy_return_val() : () -> i32
// CHECK-NEXT: llvm.return %0 : i32
// CHECK-NEXT: }
+
+// -----
+
+// Test FIR complex addition conversion
+// given: (x + iy) + (x' + iy')
+// result: (x + x') + i(y + y')
+
+func @fir_complex_add(%a: !fir.complex<16>, %b: !fir.complex<16>) -> !fir.complex<16> {
+ %c = fir.addc %a, %b : !fir.complex<16>
+ return %c : !fir.complex<16>
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: llvm.func @fir_complex_add(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>,
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG1:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>) -> !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)> {
+// CHECK: %[[X0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[X1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[ADD_X0_X1:.*]] = llvm.fadd %[[X0]], %[[X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[ADD_Y0_Y1:.*]] = llvm.fadd %[[Y0]], %[[Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.mlir.undef : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[ADD_X0_X1]], %{{.*}}[0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[ADD_Y0_Y1]], %{{.*}}[1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: llvm.return %{{.*}} : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+
+// -----
+
+// Test FIR complex substraction conversion
+// given: (x + iy) - (x' + iy')
+// result: (x - x') + i(y - y')
+
+func @fir_complex_sub(%a: !fir.complex<16>, %b: !fir.complex<16>) -> !fir.complex<16> {
+ %c = fir.subc %a, %b : !fir.complex<16>
+ return %c : !fir.complex<16>
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: llvm.func @fir_complex_sub(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>,
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG1:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>) -> !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)> {
+// CHECK: %[[X0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[X1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[SUB_X0_X1:.*]] = llvm.fsub %[[X0]], %[[X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[SUB_Y0_Y1:.*]] = llvm.fsub %[[Y0]], %[[Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.mlir.undef : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[SUB_X0_X1]], %{{.*}}[0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[SUB_Y0_Y1]], %{{.*}}[1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: llvm.return %{{.*}} : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+
+// -----
+
+// Test FIR complex multiply conversion
+// given: (x + iy) * (x' + iy')
+// result: (xx'-yy')+i(xy'+yx')
+
+func @fir_complex_mul(%a: !fir.complex<16>, %b: !fir.complex<16>) -> !fir.complex<16> {
+ %c = fir.mulc %a, %b : !fir.complex<16>
+ return %c : !fir.complex<16>
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: llvm.func @fir_complex_mul(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>,
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG1:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>) -> !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)> {
+// CHECK: %[[X0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[X1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_X0_X1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[X0]], %[[X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_Y0_X1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[Y0]], %[[X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_X0_Y1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[X0]], %[[Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[ADD:.*]] = llvm.fadd %[[MUL_X0_Y1]], %[[MUL_Y0_X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_Y0_Y1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[Y0]], %[[Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[SUB:.*]] = llvm.fsub %[[MUL_X0_X1]], %[[MUL_Y0_Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.mlir.undef : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[SUB]], %{{.*}}[0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[ADD]], %{{.*}}[1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: llvm.return %{{.*}} : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+
+// -----
+
+// Test FIR complex division conversion
+// given: (x + iy) / (x' + iy')
+// result: ((xx'+yy')/d) + i((yx'-xy')/d) where d = x'x' + y'y'
+
+func @fir_complex_div(%a: !fir.complex<16>, %b: !fir.complex<16>) -> !fir.complex<16> {
+ %c = fir.divc %a, %b : !fir.complex<16>
+ return %c : !fir.complex<16>
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: llvm.func @fir_complex_div(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>,
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG1:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>) -> !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)> {
+// CHECK: %[[X0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y0:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[X1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y1:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG1]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_X0_X1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[X0]], %[[X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_X1_X1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[X1]], %[[X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_Y0_X1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[Y0]], %[[X1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_X0_Y1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[X0]], %[[Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_Y0_Y1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[Y0]], %[[Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[MUL_Y1_Y1:.*]] = llvm.fmul %[[Y1]], %[[Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[ADD_X1X1_Y1Y1:.*]] = llvm.fadd %[[MUL_X1_X1]], %[[MUL_Y1_Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[ADD_X0X1_Y0Y1:.*]] = llvm.fadd %[[MUL_X0_X1]], %[[MUL_Y0_Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[SUB_Y0X1_X0Y1:.*]] = llvm.fsub %[[MUL_Y0_X1]], %[[MUL_X0_Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[DIV0:.*]] = llvm.fdiv %[[ADD_X0X1_Y0Y1]], %[[ADD_X1X1_Y1Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[DIV1:.*]] = llvm.fdiv %[[SUB_Y0X1_X0Y1]], %[[ADD_X1X1_Y1Y1]] : f128
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.mlir.undef : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[DIV0]], %{{.*}}[0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[DIV1]], %{{.*}}[1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: llvm.return %{{.*}} : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+
+// -----
+
+// Test FIR complex negation conversion
+// given: -(x + iy)
+// result: -x - iy
+
+func @fir_complex_neg(%a: !fir.complex<16>) -> !fir.complex<16> {
+ %c = fir.negc %a : !fir.complex<16>
+ return %c : !fir.complex<16>
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: llvm.func @fir_complex_neg(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.*]]: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>) -> !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)> {
+// CHECK: %[[X:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[Y:.*]] = llvm.extractvalue %[[ARG0]][1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %[[NEGX:.*]] = llvm.fneg %[[X]] : f128
+// CHECK: %[[NEGY:.*]] = llvm.fneg %[[Y]] : f128
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[NEGX]], %{{.*}}[0 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: %{{.*}} = llvm.insertvalue %[[NEGY]], %{{.*}}[1 : i32] : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
+// CHECK: llvm.return %{{.*}} : !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>
diff --git a/flang/test/Fir/types-to-llvm.fir b/flang/test/Fir/types-to-llvm.fir
index 409e6dae043c..8bd007ecd202 100644
--- a/flang/test/Fir/types-to-llvm.fir
+++ b/flang/test/Fir/types-to-llvm.fir
@@ -72,3 +72,31 @@ func private @foo3(%arg0: !fir.logical<8>)
func private @foo4(%arg0: !fir.logical<16>)
// CHECK-LABEL: foo4
// CHECK-SAME: i128
+
+// -----
+
+// Test `!fir.complex<KIND>` conversion.
+
+func private @foo0(%arg0: !fir.complex<2>)
+// CHECK-LABEL: foo0
+// CHECK-SAME: !llvm.struct<(f16, f16)>)
+
+func private @foo1(%arg0: !fir.complex<3>)
+// CHECK-LABEL: foo1
+// CHECK-SAME: !llvm.struct<(bf16, bf16)>)
+
+func private @foo2(%arg0: !fir.complex<4>)
+// CHECK-LABEL: foo2
+// CHECK-SAME: !llvm.struct<(f32, f32)>)
+
+func private @foo3(%arg0: !fir.complex<8>)
+// CHECK-LABEL: foo3
+// CHECK-SAME: !llvm.struct<(f64, f64)>)
+
+func private @foo4(%arg0: !fir.complex<10>)
+// CHECK-LABEL: foo4
+// CHECK-SAME: !llvm.struct<(f80, f80)>)
+
+func private @foo5(%arg0: !fir.complex<16>)
+// CHECK-LABEL: foo5
+// CHECK-SAME: !llvm.struct<(f128, f128)>)
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list