[flang-commits] [PATCH] D87906: [Flang][OpenACC] Fix for branching out issue in OpenACC parallel construct.
Tim Keith via Phabricator via flang-commits
flang-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 28 10:57:31 PDT 2020
tskeith added inline comments.
================
Comment at: flang/include/flang/Semantics/tools.h:531
+template <typename A> const parser::Name *MaybeGetStmtName(const A &a);
+template <typename A> const parser::Name *MaybeGetConstructName(const A &a);
----------------
Is this used?
================
Comment at: flang/include/flang/Semantics/tools.h:534
+const parser::Name *MaybeGetConstructName(
+ const parser::BlockConstruct &blockConstruct);
+const parser::Name *MaybeGetNodeName(const ConstructNode &construct);
----------------
It looks like the only place that MaybeGetConstructName is used is in MaybeGetNodeName, so how about just doing it inline there? I don't see a benefit of making it part of the API of tools.h.
================
Comment at: flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp:84
+ void emitBranchOutErrorWithLabel(
+ const char *stmt, const parser::Name &toLabel) const {
----------------
Function names should start with a capital letter.
================
Comment at: flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp:92
+ "%s to a label '%s' outside of %s construct is not allowed"_err_en_US,
+ stmt, labelName, upperCaseConstructName)
+ .Attach(sourcePosition_, GetEnclosingMsg());
----------------
That is not a label, it's a construct name. It confuses the user and the code to call things labels that are not.
================
Comment at: flang/lib/Semantics/check-acc-structure.cpp:102
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
----------------
`return stmtName.source == constructName.source;`
This is probably better done inline.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87906/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87906
More information about the flang-commits
mailing list