[cfe-users] Need a GCC-free LLVM/Clang on Linux.
Chris Green via cfe-users
cfe-users at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 9 11:43:15 PDT 2020
Hi,
Many thanks for this advice. I'm just now getting back to this. If I
solve the libgcc_s problem, I'll let you know.
Thanks again,
Chris.
On 2/19/20 4:02 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 07:24, Christopher H Green via cfe-users
> <cfe-users at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-users at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've spent the last several days trying to build a fast,
> full-featured relocatable distribution of LLVM/Clang 9.0.1 on
> Linux RHEL7, which has an older native GCC (4.8.5)—I can't require
> the RH toolset. I have access to a modern version of GCC in order
> to make the stage-1 build, but I need the final product not only
> to be relocatable, but also to be free of any dependence on that
> GCC or its libraries. In other words, I want to be able to
> distribute an LLVM/CLang which defaults to compiling using libc++,
> libcxxabi, compiler-rt, libunwind, and ldd, and which itself
> depends neither on libstdc++ or libgcc_s. I'd also like to be
> able to to provide LTO, but whether the compiler is itself the
> beneficiary of LTO is optional. As a final wish, I'd like the
> distribution as installed to serve as an SDK against which to
> build other components such as separately packaged lldb and f18.
> Oh, and I want a pony.
>
> Here's what I have so far (CMake cache files attached for stages 1
> and 2). Invoked in a separate build directory with:
>
> env CC=gcc-9 CXX=g++-9 \
> 'CXXFLAGS=-Wno-cast-function-type -Wno-deprecated-copy -Wno-init-list-lifetime -Wno-pessimizing-move -Wno-redundant-move -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-variable' \
> cmake -GNinja -C FNAL.cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<install-path> \
> -DBOOTSTRAP_LLVM_CXX_STD=c++17 <src-path>
> ninja
> ninja install
>
> (The CXXFLAGS are just to keep the noise down during the stage-1
> build).
>
> I appear (finally) to have a mostly functioning build /in situ/,
> but the installed compiler depends upon libstdc++ to be able to
> run, and I should have put --rtlib=compiler-rt in LINKER_FLAGS
> rather than CXX_FLAGS. Additionally, I haven't been able to come
> up with a good set of targets for LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS,
> but when I do I think I need to exclude static libraries if I'm
> doing LTO, no?
>
> I suspect I need a three stage build—well, two stage 2s, at
> least—but any advice would be appreciated as I'm wandering around
> in the dark at this point.
>
> I have a two-stage setup that builds a GCC-free Clang except for
> libgcc_s (I've not looked at what's pulling that in yet, but I expect
> that's resolvable).
>
> My stage1 cmake setup has: -DCLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB=libc++
> -DCLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB=compiler-rt
> My stage2 cmake setup additionally
> has: -DLIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER=ON -DLIBCXXABI_USE_COMPILER_RT=ON
> -DLIBCXX_USE_COMPILER_RT=ON
> (and points CMAKE_C_COMPILER and CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER at the stage1 clang).
>
> There might be some other things you need, I'm not sure. But it should
> be doable in two stages.
>
> Many thanks for any help,
>
> Chris.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-users mailing list
> cfe-users at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-users at lists.llvm.org>
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Dusers&d=DwMFaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=kj1IkzpbbOO6DafO4zbQ7w&m=FIIJJm01Dy-T_1Fy2242m46OGICK9DChJUP91xh3UXg&s=2qYj-B0uBuvWEJmOP60fqRlTLu-3sXE_Va_7usXqMtQ&e=>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-users/attachments/20200309/2d814c13/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-users
mailing list