[cfe-users] problem with `candidate template ignored: invalid explicitly-specified argument'
Jan Korous via cfe-users
cfe-users at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 7 11:44:09 PST 2018
> On Nov 7, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG via cfe-users <cfe-users at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration
>> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class
>> function declaration does not take the template parameter list into
>> account: http://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#15.sentence-1
> Our main lilypond developer disagrees. He writes:
> This link states:
> When a using-declarator brings declarations from a base class into
> a derived class, member functions and member function templates in
> the derived class override and/or hide member functions and member
> function templates with the same name, parameter-type-list,
> cv-qualification, and ref-qualifier (if any) in a base class
> (rather than conflicting).
> The parameter-type-list is a different one in this example since
> they contain a different member function pointer type. Which is the
> reason we need the whole hooplahoop in the first place.
Isn’t it template-parameter-list that is different rather than parameter-type-list?
> For context, the whole lilypond thread starts at
> cfe-users mailing list
> cfe-users at lists.llvm.org
More information about the cfe-users