[cfe-users] ODP: marking gtest runs as failed when errors by sanitizers are found

[Stepniak, Artur (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)]

hi,

the problem I'm getting that doesn't cause any of the desired effects you described is this:

runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 1 - 32 cannot be represented in type 'unsigned int'
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: undefined-behavior

Maybe it's the only issue that doesn't crash the process
________________________________
Od: ext Alexey Samsonov [vonosmas at gmail.com]
Wysłano: 29 kwietnia 2015 20:27
Do: Stepniak, Artur (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)
DW: cfe-users at cs.uiuc.edu
Temat: Re: [cfe-users] marking gtest runs as failed when errors by sanitizers are found

Hi!

What specific sanitizer do you refer to? They behave differently - e.g. ASan and MSan by default crash the process after the fist bug is found. TSan prints all the error reports, and tries to crash the process with non-zero exitcode at the end, if at least one issue was found. UBSan by default doesn't crash the process, but can be instructed to do so by adding -fno-sanitize-recover=all to your compile flags.



On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Stepniak, Artur (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <artur.stepniak at nokia.com<mailto:artur.stepniak at nokia.com>> wrote:
Hi,

as in the topic. Currently when errors by clang sanitizers are found the tests is still marked as passed which complicates our CI because we'd need to implement parsing of console output. Is there a way to make gtest fail in such situation?

Regards,
Artur

_______________________________________________
cfe-users mailing list
cfe-users at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:cfe-users at cs.uiuc.edu>
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users




--
Alexey Samsonov
vonosmas at gmail.com<mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-users/attachments/20150430/7d35b4e7/attachment.html>